今天先读文章。所有语法、词汇、短语和发音都从这篇文章里学，不需要先读一页操作说明。
01 · Anchor passage
During a drought, a city published daily reservoir levels and limited non-essential water use.
/ˈdʊɹɪŋ ə dɹaʊt, ə ˈsɪti ˈpʌblɪʃt ˈdeɪli ˈɹɛzəvˌwɑɹ ˈlɛvəlz ænd ˈlɪmɪtɪd nɑn ɪˈsɛnʃəl ˈwɔtɚ jus./
在干旱期间，一座城市公布了每日水库水位并限制了非必要用水。
During a drought a — 保留结构，替换真实细节。At first, this looked like a small decision about natural resources, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
起初，这看起来像是一个关于自然资源的小决定，但其结果很快就变得显而易见。
result — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case raises a broader question: how finite resources require fair and careful management.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ˈfaɪˌnaɪt ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ɹɪˈkwaɪɚ fɛɹ ænd ˈkɛɹfəl ˈmænɪd͡ʒmənt./
这个案例提出了一个更广泛的问题：有限的资源如何需要公平和谨慎的管理。
The case raises a — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main constraint, limited access to reliable information, shaped the final decision about natural resources.
/ðə meɪn kənˈstɹeɪnt, ˈlɪmɪtɪd ˈækˌsɛs tə ɹɪˈlaɪəbəl ˌɪnfɔɹˈmeɪʃən, ʃeɪpt ðə ˈfaɪnəl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz./
主要制约因素是获取可靠信息的机会有限，决定了关于自然资源的最终决定。
The main constraint limited — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The example draws attention to a natural resource, which can shape how people respond to natural resources.
/ðə ɪɡˈzæmpəl dɹɔz əˈtɛnʃən tə ə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹs, wɪt͡ʃ kən ʃeɪp haʊ ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz./
这个例子提请注意自然资源，它可以决定人们如何对自然资源作出反应。
natural resource — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A closer look at a water scarcity reveals a practical side of natural resources that general opinions often miss.
/ə ˈkloʊsɚ lʊk æt ə ˈwɔtɚ ˈskɛɹsɪti ɹɪˈvilz ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl saɪd əv ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ðæt ˈd͡ʒɛnɚəl əˈpɪnjənz ˈɔftən mɪs./
仔细观察水资源短缺问题可以揭示自然资源的实际一面，而一般观点往往忽视这一面。
water scarcity — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case shows why a similar experience matters when people make decisions about natural resources.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ə ˈsɪmɪlɚ ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz./
该案表明，当人们就自然资源作出决定时，类似的经验为何重要。
similar — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A different experience can change how people understand and respond to natural resources.
/ə ˈdɪfɹənt ɪkˈspɪɹiəns kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz./
不同的经历可以改变人们对自然资源的理解和反应。
different — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When discussing natural resources, people should explain why a significant effect matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ə sɪɡˈnɪfɪkənt ɪˈfɛkt ˈmætɚz./
在讨论自然资源时，人们应该解释为什么一个重大影响很重要。
significant — 保留结构，替换真实细节。One key factor can explain why people experience natural resources in different ways.
/wʌn ki ˈfæktɚ kən ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ˈpipəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ɪn ˈdɪfɹənt weɪz./
一个关键因素可以解释为什么人们以不同的方式体验自然资源。
different — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Values, resources, and past experience can influence behaviour related to natural resources.
/ˈvæljuz, ˈɹisɔɹsɪz, ænd pæst ɪkˈspɪɹiəns kən ˈɪnfluəns bɪˈheɪvjɚ ɹɪˈleɪtɪd tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz./
价值、资源和过去的经验可以影响与自然资源有关的行为。
influence behaviour — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The immediate effect of natural resources may be easy to see, while the longer-term effect is often less obvious.
/ðə ɪˈmidiɪt ɪˈfɛkt əv ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz meɪ bi ˈizi tə si, waɪl ðə ˈlɔŋɡɚ tɚm ɪˈfɛkt ɪz ˈɔftən lɛs ˈɑbviəs./
自然资源的直接影响可能很容易看到，而较长期的影响往往不那么明显。
The immediate effect of — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A careful comparison uses the same standard for both choices and separates convenience from lasting value.
/ə ˈkɛɹfəl kəmˈpɛɹəsən ˈjuzɪz ðə seɪm ˈstændɚd fɚ boʊθ ˈt͡ʃɔɪsɪz ænd ˈsɛpɚˌeɪts kənˈvinjəns fɹʌm ˈlæstɪŋ ˈvælju./
仔细比较后，这两种选择都使用相同的标准，并将便利性与持久价值区分开来。
A careful comparison uses — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Once the difference is clear, a speaker can give a preference without pretending that the other option has no merit.
/wʌns ðə ˈdɪfɹəns ɪz klɪɹ, ə ˈspikɚ kən ɡɪv ə ˈpɹɛfɚəns wɪˈðaʊt pɹiˈtɛndɪŋ ðæt ðə ˈʌðɚ ˈɑpʃən hæz noʊ ˈmɛɹɪt./
一旦差异明显，发言者就可以给出偏好，而不必假装其他选项没有优点。
Once the difference is — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A long-term consequence of natural resources may be less visible than the immediate result.
/ə lɔŋ tɚm ˈkɑnsəkwəns əv ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz meɪ bi lɛs ˈvɪzɪbəl ðən ðə ɪˈmidiɪt ɹɪˈzʌlt./
自然资源的长期后果可能不如直接后果那么明显。
long-term consequence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A balanced approach to natural resources compares benefits, costs, and the needs of different groups.
/ə ˈbælənst əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz kəmˈpɛɹz ˈbɛnəfɪts, kɔsts, ænd ðə nidz əv ˈdɪfɹənt ɡɹups./
对自然资源的平衡方法会比较收益、成本和不同群体的需求。
different — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main benefit of a thoughtful response to natural resources is a result that people can actually observe.
/ðə meɪn ˈbɛnəfɪt əv ə ˈθɔtfəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ɪz ə ɹɪˈzʌlt ðæt ˈpipəl kən ˈækt͡ʃəli əbˈzɚv./
对自然资源作出深思熟虑的反应的主要好处是人们实际上能够观察到的结果。
benefit — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main challenge is to respond to natural resources without creating a larger problem elsewhere.
/ðə meɪn ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒ ɪz tə ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz wɪˈðaʊt kɹiˈeɪtɪŋ ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˈpɹɑbləm ˈɛlˌswɛɹ./
主要挑战是在别处不造成更大的问题的情况下对自然资源作出反应。
challenge — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People can compare two responses to natural resources only when they use the same criteria.
/ˈpipəl kən kəmˈpɛɹ tu ɹɪˈspɑnsɪz tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ˈoʊnli wɛn ðeɪ juz ðə seɪm kɹaɪˈtɪɹiə./
人们只有使用相同的标准才能比较两种对自然资源的反应。
compare — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A convincing view of natural resources gives a reason and then tests it against a concrete example.
/ə kənˈvɪnsɪŋ vju əv ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ɡɪvz ə ˈɹizən ænd ðɛn tɛsts ɪt əˈɡɛnst ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl./
对自然资源的令人信服的看法给出了一个理由，然后用一个具体的例子来检验它。
reason — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The result matters because it shows whether a response to natural resources worked in practice.
/ðə ɹɪˈzʌlt ˈmætɚz bɪˈkʌz ɪt ʃoʊz ˈwɛðɚ ə ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz wɚkt ɪn ˈpɹæktɪs./
其结果很重要，因为它表明对自然资源的反应在实践中是否有效。
result — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A positive change in natural resources becomes credible when people can explain how it happened.
/ə ˈpɑzɪtɪv t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪn ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz bɪˈkʌmz ˈkɹɛdɪbəl wɛn ˈpipəl kən ɪkˈspleɪn haʊ ɪt ˈhæpənd./
当人们能够解释自然资源的积极变化是如何发生的时，它就会变得可信。
positive change — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The most practical lesson is that natural resources should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
最实际的教训是，应该通过实际效果而不是有吸引力的口号来判断自然资源。
rather than — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
好的决定会把明确目标、事实证据、人的真实经验，以及修正薄弱方案的意愿联系起来。
approach — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
当这些部分保持连贯时，无论日常交流还是 IELTS 回答，这个主题都会更容易展开。
When those parts stay — 保留结构，替换真实细节。During a drought, a city published daily reservoir levels and limited non-essential water use.
/ˈdʊɹɪŋ ə dɹaʊt, ə ˈsɪti ˈpʌblɪʃt ˈdeɪli ˈɹɛzəvˌwɑɹ ˈlɛvəlz ænd ˈlɪmɪtɪd nɑn ɪˈsɛnʃəl ˈwɔtɚ jus./
At first, this looked like a small decision about natural resources, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
The case raises a broader question: how finite resources require fair and careful management.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ˈfaɪˌnaɪt ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ɹɪˈkwaɪɚ fɛɹ ænd ˈkɛɹfəl ˈmænɪd͡ʒmənt./
The main constraint, limited access to reliable information, shaped the final decision about natural resources.
/ðə meɪn kənˈstɹeɪnt, ˈlɪmɪtɪd ˈækˌsɛs tə ɹɪˈlaɪəbəl ˌɪnfɔɹˈmeɪʃən, ʃeɪpt ðə ˈfaɪnəl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz./
The example draws attention to a natural resource, which can shape how people respond to natural resources.
/ðə ɪɡˈzæmpəl dɹɔz əˈtɛnʃən tə ə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹs, wɪt͡ʃ kən ʃeɪp haʊ ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz./
A closer look at a water scarcity reveals a practical side of natural resources that general opinions often miss.
/ə ˈkloʊsɚ lʊk æt ə ˈwɔtɚ ˈskɛɹsɪti ɹɪˈvilz ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl saɪd əv ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ðæt ˈd͡ʒɛnɚəl əˈpɪnjənz ˈɔftən mɪs./
The case shows why a similar experience matters when people make decisions about natural resources.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ə ˈsɪmɪlɚ ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz./
A different experience can change how people understand and respond to natural resources.
/ə ˈdɪfɹənt ɪkˈspɪɹiəns kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz./
When discussing natural resources, people should explain why a significant effect matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ə sɪɡˈnɪfɪkənt ɪˈfɛkt ˈmætɚz./
One key factor can explain why people experience natural resources in different ways.
/wʌn ki ˈfæktɚ kən ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ˈpipəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ɪn ˈdɪfɹənt weɪz./
Values, resources, and past experience can influence behaviour related to natural resources.
/ˈvæljuz, ˈɹisɔɹsɪz, ænd pæst ɪkˈspɪɹiəns kən ˈɪnfluəns bɪˈheɪvjɚ ɹɪˈleɪtɪd tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz./
The immediate effect of natural resources may be easy to see, while the longer-term effect is often less obvious.
/ðə ɪˈmidiɪt ɪˈfɛkt əv ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz meɪ bi ˈizi tə si, waɪl ðə ˈlɔŋɡɚ tɚm ɪˈfɛkt ɪz ˈɔftən lɛs ˈɑbviəs./
A careful comparison uses the same standard for both choices and separates convenience from lasting value.
/ə ˈkɛɹfəl kəmˈpɛɹəsən ˈjuzɪz ðə seɪm ˈstændɚd fɚ boʊθ ˈt͡ʃɔɪsɪz ænd ˈsɛpɚˌeɪts kənˈvinjəns fɹʌm ˈlæstɪŋ ˈvælju./
Once the difference is clear, a speaker can give a preference without pretending that the other option has no merit.
/wʌns ðə ˈdɪfɹəns ɪz klɪɹ, ə ˈspikɚ kən ɡɪv ə ˈpɹɛfɚəns wɪˈðaʊt pɹiˈtɛndɪŋ ðæt ðə ˈʌðɚ ˈɑpʃən hæz noʊ ˈmɛɹɪt./
A long-term consequence of natural resources may be less visible than the immediate result.
/ə lɔŋ tɚm ˈkɑnsəkwəns əv ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz meɪ bi lɛs ˈvɪzɪbəl ðən ðə ɪˈmidiɪt ɹɪˈzʌlt./
A balanced approach to natural resources compares benefits, costs, and the needs of different groups.
/ə ˈbælənst əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz kəmˈpɛɹz ˈbɛnəfɪts, kɔsts, ænd ðə nidz əv ˈdɪfɹənt ɡɹups./
The main benefit of a thoughtful response to natural resources is a result that people can actually observe.
/ðə meɪn ˈbɛnəfɪt əv ə ˈθɔtfəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ɪz ə ɹɪˈzʌlt ðæt ˈpipəl kən ˈækt͡ʃəli əbˈzɚv./
The main challenge is to respond to natural resources without creating a larger problem elsewhere.
/ðə meɪn ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒ ɪz tə ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz wɪˈðaʊt kɹiˈeɪtɪŋ ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˈpɹɑbləm ˈɛlˌswɛɹ./
People can compare two responses to natural resources only when they use the same criteria.
/ˈpipəl kən kəmˈpɛɹ tu ɹɪˈspɑnsɪz tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ˈoʊnli wɛn ðeɪ juz ðə seɪm kɹaɪˈtɪɹiə./
A convincing view of natural resources gives a reason and then tests it against a concrete example.
/ə kənˈvɪnsɪŋ vju əv ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ɡɪvz ə ˈɹizən ænd ðɛn tɛsts ɪt əˈɡɛnst ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl./
The result matters because it shows whether a response to natural resources worked in practice.
/ðə ɹɪˈzʌlt ˈmætɚz bɪˈkʌz ɪt ʃoʊz ˈwɛðɚ ə ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz wɚkt ɪn ˈpɹæktɪs./
A positive change in natural resources becomes credible when people can explain how it happened.
/ə ˈpɑzɪtɪv t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪn ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz bɪˈkʌmz ˈkɹɛdɪbəl wɛn ˈpipəl kən ɪkˈspleɪn haʊ ɪt ˈhæpənd./
The most practical lesson is that natural resources should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt ˈnæt͡ʃɚəl ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
02 · Vocabulary
n./phrase · 资源
a key idea used when discussing natural resources
natural resource
n./phrase · 稀缺
a key idea used when discussing natural resources
water scarcity
adj. · 相似的
almost the same
a similar pattern
adj. · 不同的
not the same
a different view
adj. · 显著的
important enough to be noticed
a significant increase
n. · 因素
one of the things that causes a result
a key factor
n./v. · 影响
the power to affect a person or event
influence behaviour
n. · 后果
a result of an action or condition
long-term consequence
n./v. · 方法；处理
a way of dealing with something
a balanced approach
n./v. · 益处
a helpful or positive effect
bring benefits
n./v. · 挑战
a difficult task that tests ability
face a challenge
v. · 比较
to examine how things are similar or different
compare two options
n. · 原因
a cause or explanation
give a reason
n. · 结果
something that happens because of an action
as a result
n./v. · 改变
to become different
positive change
03 · Chunks
natural resource资源；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。water scarcity稀缺；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。a similar pattern相似的；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。a different view不同的；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。a significant increase显著的；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。a key factor因素；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。influence behaviour影响；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。long-term consequence后果；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。04 · Grammar
这个结构负责把事实、原因、条件或立场组织成一个边界清楚的复杂句。
结构：main clause + logical relationship + supporting clause
原文证据：The main constraint, limited access to reliable information, shaped the final decision about natural resources.
常见错误：先保证两个分句都完整，再追求句式复杂度；不要用连接词拼接残句。
你的替换：保留结构，把主题换成自己的工作、生活或学习经历。
05 · Pronunciation
练法：慢读单词 → 读完整搭配 → 回到原句；每一步只录一遍，听完再修正。
06 · Spiral review
Day 160、Day 158、Day 154、Day 147、Day 131
07 · Speak with AI
你是我的一对一英语口语教练。今天是 Day 161，主题是 natural resources，程度目标是 B1→B2。
先让我用自己的话复述今天的文章；一次只问一个问题，并等待我回答。
如果我卡住，只给 2–4 个关键词或一个句首，不要直接给完整答案。
请引导我使用这些词：resource, scarcity, similar, different, significant, factor, influence, consequence。
我的回答至少包含：一个事实、一个原因、一个具体例子、一个结果或判断。
每轮结束后只纠正最影响理解的 1 个语法问题和 1 个发音问题，然后让我重新回答同一个问题。
最后让我脱稿回答：How is natural resources connected to your real life, and what have you learned from it?
结束时用中文列出：做得好的证据、需要修正的两点、三个可复用句型、明天应复习的内容。08 · Imitation
必须回收
resource, scarcity, similar, different, significant, factor, influence, consequence09 · Three-hour path