今天先读文章。所有语法、词汇、短语和发音都从这篇文章里学，不需要先读一页操作说明。
01 · Anchor passage
A class repeated a plant-growth experiment because the first result came from only three samples.
/ə klæs ɹɪˈpitɪd ə plænt ɡɹoʊθ ɪkˈspɛɹɪmənt bɪˈkʌz ðə fɚst ɹɪˈzʌlt keɪm fɹʌm ˈoʊnli θɹi ˈsæmpəlz./
一个班级重复了植物生长实验，因为第一个结果仅来自三个样本。
experiment — 保留结构，替换真实细节。At first, this looked like a small decision about science, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
起初，这看起来像是一个关于科学的小决定，但其结果很快就变得可见。
At first — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case raises a broader question: how evidence and testing improve explanations.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ˈɛvədəns ænd ˈtɛstɪŋ ɪmˈpɹuv ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃənz./
该案提出了一个更广泛的问题：证据和检验如何改进解释。
The case raises a — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Although the sentence contains two clauses, each clause remains complete and accurately connected.
/ɔlˈðoʊ ðə ˈsɛntəns kənˈteɪnz tu ˈklɔzɪz, it͡ʃ klɔz ɹɪˈmeɪnz kəmˈplit ænd ˈækjɚɪtli kəˈnɛktɪd./
尽管该句子包含两个分句，但每个分句仍然完整且准确连接。
although — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The example draws attention to a conduct an experiment, which can shape how people respond to science.
/ðə ɪɡˈzæmpəl dɹɔz əˈtɛnʃən tə ə ˈkɑndʌkt ən ɪkˈspɛɹɪmənt, wɪt͡ʃ kən ʃeɪp haʊ ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns./
这个例子引起人们注意进行一个实验，可以决定人们如何对科学作出反应。
conduct an experiment — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People can test a hypothesis when a real situation involving science requires action.
/ˈpipəl kən tɛst ə haɪˈpɑθəsəs wɛn ə ɹil ˌsɪt͡ʃuˈeɪʃən ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ ˈsaɪəns ɹiˈkwaɪɚz ˈækʃən./
当涉及科学的真实情况需要采取行动时，人们可以检验假设。
test a hypothesis — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A practical solution to science should fit local needs and remain realistic over time.
/ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈluʃən tə ˈsaɪəns ʃʊd fɪt ˈloʊkəl nidz ænd ɹɪˈmeɪn ˌɹiəˈlɪstɪk ˈoʊvɚ taɪm./
实用的科学解决方案应该适合当地的需求，并随着时间的推移保持现实。
practical solution — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A positive change in science becomes credible when people can explain how it happened.
/ə ˈpɑzɪtɪv t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪn ˈsaɪəns bɪˈkʌmz ˈkɹɛdɪbəl wɛn ˈpipəl kən ɪkˈspleɪn haʊ ɪt ˈhæpənd./
当人们能够解释科学上的积极变化是如何发生的时，它就会变得可信。
positive change — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Practical support can help people respond to science without removing individual responsibility.
/ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈpɔɹt kən hɛlp ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈmuvɪŋ ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɹiˌspɑnsɪˈbɪləti./
实际支持可以帮助人们对科学做出反应，同时又不免除个人责任。
support — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Communities can develop a practical response to science by testing a small change first.
/kəˈmjunɪtiz kən dɪˈvɛləp ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈsaɪəns baɪ ˈtɛstɪŋ ə smɔl t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ fɚst./
社区可以通过首先测试一个小的改变来制定对科学的实际反应。
change — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The effect of science may vary according to a person's needs, resources, and circumstances.
/ðə ɪˈfɛkt əv ˈsaɪəns meɪ ˈvɛɹi əˈkɔɹdɪŋ tə ə ˈpɚsənz nidz, ˈɹisɔɹsɪz, ænd ˈsɚkəmˌstænsɪz./
科学的效果可能因个人的需求、资源和情况而异。
effect — 保留结构，替换真实细节。An opinion about science becomes useful only after it is supported by a reason and an example.
/ən əˈpɪnjən əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns bɪˈkʌmz ˈjusfəl ˈoʊnli ˈæftɚ ɪt ɪz səˈpɔɹtɪd baɪ ə ˈɹizən ænd ən ɪɡˈzæmpəl./
关于科学的观点只有在得到理由和例子的支持后才变得有用。
opinion — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Personal experience is a useful starting point, but evidence about science must also include other groups and conditions.
/ˈpɚsənəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ɪz ə ˈjusfəl ˈstɑɹtɪŋ pɔɪnt, bʌt ˈɛvədəns əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns mʌst ˈɔlsoʊ ɪŋˈklud ˈʌðɚ ɡɹups ænd kənˈdɪʃənz./
个人经验是一个有用的起点，但有关科学的证据还必须包括其他群体和条件。
include — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A single example can show that a response is possible; it cannot prove that the response will work everywhere.
/ə ˈsɪŋɡəl ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən ʃoʊ ðæt ə ɹɪˈspɑns ɪz ˈpɑsəbəl; ɪt kæˈnɑt pɹuv ðæt ðə ɹɪˈspɑns wɪl wɚk ˈɛvɹiˌwɛɹ./
一个例子就可以表明响应是可能的；它不能证明这种应对措施在任何地方都有效。
A single example can — 保留结构，替换真实细节。For that reason, responsible decisions define a goal, observe the result, and change direction when the evidence is weak.
/fɚ ðæt ˈɹizən, ɹiˈspɑnsɪbəl dɪˈsɪʒənz dɪˈfaɪn ə ɡoʊl, əbˈzɚv ðə ɹɪˈzʌlt, ænd t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ dɪˈɹɛkʃən wɛn ðə ˈɛvədəns ɪz wik./
因此，负责任的决策会定义目标，观察结果，并在证据薄弱时改变方向。
change — 保留结构，替换真实细节。However, an early success can hide a cost that appears later.
/ˌhaʊˈɛvɚ, ən ˈɚli səkˈsɛs kən haɪd ə kɔst ðæt əˈpɪɹz ˈleɪtɚ./
然而，早期的成功可能会掩盖后来出现的成本。
however — 保留结构，替换真实细节。This matters because the decision changes what people can do in ordinary life.
/ðɪs ˈmætɚz bɪˈkʌz ðə dɪˈsɪʒən ˈt͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒɪz wʌt ˈpipəl kən du ɪn ˈɔɹdɪˌnɛɹi laɪf./
这很重要，因为决定会改变人们在普通生活中所能做的事情。
because — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Although one response may help, no single solution will suit every person.
/ɔlˈðoʊ wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns meɪ hɛlp, noʊ ˈsɪŋɡəl səˈluʃən wɪl sut ˈɛvɹi ˈpɚsən./
尽管一种回应可能会有所帮助，但没有一种解决方案适合所有人。
solution — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A balanced discussion of science should include an example, a limitation, and a conclusion.
/ə ˈbælənst dɪˈskʌʃən əv ˈsaɪəns ʃʊd ɪŋˈklud ən ɪɡˈzæmpəl, ə ˌlɪmɪˈteɪʃən, ænd ə kəŋˈkluʒən./
平衡的科学讨论应该包括例子、限制和结论。
include an example — 保留结构，替换真实细节。An important effect can change how people understand and respond to science.
/ən ɪmˈpɔɹtənt ɪˈfɛkt kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns./
一个重要的影响可以改变人们对科学的理解和反应。
change — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A concrete example can provide evidence for a claim about science.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən pɹəˈvaɪd ˈɛvədəns fɚ ə kleɪm əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns./
一个具体的例子可以为有关科学的主张提供证据。
provide evidence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A balanced approach to science compares benefits, costs, and the needs of different groups.
/ə ˈbælənst əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ tə ˈsaɪəns kəmˈpɛɹz ˈbɛnəfɪts, kɔsts, ænd ðə nidz əv ˈdɪfɹənt ɡɹups./
平衡的科学方法会比较不同群体的收益、成本和需求。
a balanced approach — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main benefit of a thoughtful response to science is a result that people can actually observe.
/ðə meɪn ˈbɛnəfɪt əv ə ˈθɔtfəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈsaɪəns ɪz ə ɹɪˈzʌlt ðæt ˈpipəl kən ˈækt͡ʃəli əbˈzɚv./
深思熟虑的对科学的反应的主要好处是人们可以实际观察的结果。
benefit — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main challenge is to respond to science without creating a larger problem elsewhere.
/ðə meɪn ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒ ɪz tə ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns wɪˈðaʊt kɹiˈeɪtɪŋ ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˈpɹɑbləm ˈɛlˌswɛɹ./
主要的挑战在于在别处不造成更大的问题的情况下对科学作出反应。
challenge — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The most practical lesson is that science should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt ˈsaɪəns ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
最实际的教训是，科学应该通过实际效果而不是有吸引力的口号来判断。
rather than — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Looking at both benefits and risks prevents the discussion from becoming a list of unsupported positive or negative claims.
/ˈlʊkɪŋ æt boʊθ ˈbɛnəfɪts ænd ɹɪsks pɹɪˈvɛnts ðə dɪˈskʌʃən fɹʌm bɪˈkʌmɪŋ ə lɪst əv ʌnsəˈpɔɹtɪd ˈpɑzɪtɪv ɔɹ ˈnɛɡɪtɪv kleɪmz./
同时考虑收益和风险可以防止讨论变成一系列未经证实的正面或负面主张。
Looking at both benefits — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
好的决定会把明确目标、事实证据、人的真实经验，以及修正薄弱方案的意愿联系起来。
approach — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
当这些部分保持连贯时，无论日常交流还是 IELTS 回答，这个主题都会更容易展开。
When those parts stay — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A class repeated a plant-growth experiment because the first result came from only three samples.
/ə klæs ɹɪˈpitɪd ə plænt ɡɹoʊθ ɪkˈspɛɹɪmənt bɪˈkʌz ðə fɚst ɹɪˈzʌlt keɪm fɹʌm ˈoʊnli θɹi ˈsæmpəlz./
At first, this looked like a small decision about science, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
The case raises a broader question: how evidence and testing improve explanations.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ˈɛvədəns ænd ˈtɛstɪŋ ɪmˈpɹuv ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃənz./
Although the sentence contains two clauses, each clause remains complete and accurately connected.
/ɔlˈðoʊ ðə ˈsɛntəns kənˈteɪnz tu ˈklɔzɪz, it͡ʃ klɔz ɹɪˈmeɪnz kəmˈplit ænd ˈækjɚɪtli kəˈnɛktɪd./
The example draws attention to a conduct an experiment, which can shape how people respond to science.
/ðə ɪɡˈzæmpəl dɹɔz əˈtɛnʃən tə ə ˈkɑndʌkt ən ɪkˈspɛɹɪmənt, wɪt͡ʃ kən ʃeɪp haʊ ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns./
People can test a hypothesis when a real situation involving science requires action.
/ˈpipəl kən tɛst ə haɪˈpɑθəsəs wɛn ə ɹil ˌsɪt͡ʃuˈeɪʃən ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ ˈsaɪəns ɹiˈkwaɪɚz ˈækʃən./
A practical solution to science should fit local needs and remain realistic over time.
/ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈluʃən tə ˈsaɪəns ʃʊd fɪt ˈloʊkəl nidz ænd ɹɪˈmeɪn ˌɹiəˈlɪstɪk ˈoʊvɚ taɪm./
A positive change in science becomes credible when people can explain how it happened.
/ə ˈpɑzɪtɪv t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪn ˈsaɪəns bɪˈkʌmz ˈkɹɛdɪbəl wɛn ˈpipəl kən ɪkˈspleɪn haʊ ɪt ˈhæpənd./
Practical support can help people respond to science without removing individual responsibility.
/ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈpɔɹt kən hɛlp ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈmuvɪŋ ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɹiˌspɑnsɪˈbɪləti./
Communities can develop a practical response to science by testing a small change first.
/kəˈmjunɪtiz kən dɪˈvɛləp ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈsaɪəns baɪ ˈtɛstɪŋ ə smɔl t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ fɚst./
The effect of science may vary according to a person's needs, resources, and circumstances.
/ðə ɪˈfɛkt əv ˈsaɪəns meɪ ˈvɛɹi əˈkɔɹdɪŋ tə ə ˈpɚsənz nidz, ˈɹisɔɹsɪz, ænd ˈsɚkəmˌstænsɪz./
An opinion about science becomes useful only after it is supported by a reason and an example.
/ən əˈpɪnjən əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns bɪˈkʌmz ˈjusfəl ˈoʊnli ˈæftɚ ɪt ɪz səˈpɔɹtɪd baɪ ə ˈɹizən ænd ən ɪɡˈzæmpəl./
Personal experience is a useful starting point, but evidence about science must also include other groups and conditions.
/ˈpɚsənəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ɪz ə ˈjusfəl ˈstɑɹtɪŋ pɔɪnt, bʌt ˈɛvədəns əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns mʌst ˈɔlsoʊ ɪŋˈklud ˈʌðɚ ɡɹups ænd kənˈdɪʃənz./
A single example can show that a response is possible; it cannot prove that the response will work everywhere.
/ə ˈsɪŋɡəl ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən ʃoʊ ðæt ə ɹɪˈspɑns ɪz ˈpɑsəbəl; ɪt kæˈnɑt pɹuv ðæt ðə ɹɪˈspɑns wɪl wɚk ˈɛvɹiˌwɛɹ./
For that reason, responsible decisions define a goal, observe the result, and change direction when the evidence is weak.
/fɚ ðæt ˈɹizən, ɹiˈspɑnsɪbəl dɪˈsɪʒənz dɪˈfaɪn ə ɡoʊl, əbˈzɚv ðə ɹɪˈzʌlt, ænd t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ dɪˈɹɛkʃən wɛn ðə ˈɛvədəns ɪz wik./
However, an early success can hide a cost that appears later.
/ˌhaʊˈɛvɚ, ən ˈɚli səkˈsɛs kən haɪd ə kɔst ðæt əˈpɪɹz ˈleɪtɚ./
This matters because the decision changes what people can do in ordinary life.
/ðɪs ˈmætɚz bɪˈkʌz ðə dɪˈsɪʒən ˈt͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒɪz wʌt ˈpipəl kən du ɪn ˈɔɹdɪˌnɛɹi laɪf./
Although one response may help, no single solution will suit every person.
/ɔlˈðoʊ wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns meɪ hɛlp, noʊ ˈsɪŋɡəl səˈluʃən wɪl sut ˈɛvɹi ˈpɚsən./
A balanced discussion of science should include an example, a limitation, and a conclusion.
/ə ˈbælənst dɪˈskʌʃən əv ˈsaɪəns ʃʊd ɪŋˈklud ən ɪɡˈzæmpəl, ə ˌlɪmɪˈteɪʃən, ænd ə kəŋˈkluʒən./
An important effect can change how people understand and respond to science.
/ən ɪmˈpɔɹtənt ɪˈfɛkt kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns./
A concrete example can provide evidence for a claim about science.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən pɹəˈvaɪd ˈɛvədəns fɚ ə kleɪm əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns./
A balanced approach to science compares benefits, costs, and the needs of different groups.
/ə ˈbælənst əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ tə ˈsaɪəns kəmˈpɛɹz ˈbɛnəfɪts, kɔsts, ænd ðə nidz əv ˈdɪfɹənt ɡɹups./
The main benefit of a thoughtful response to science is a result that people can actually observe.
/ðə meɪn ˈbɛnəfɪt əv ə ˈθɔtfəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈsaɪəns ɪz ə ɹɪˈzʌlt ðæt ˈpipəl kən ˈækt͡ʃəli əbˈzɚv./
The main challenge is to respond to science without creating a larger problem elsewhere.
/ðə meɪn ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒ ɪz tə ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns wɪˈðaʊt kɹiˈeɪtɪŋ ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˈpɹɑbləm ˈɛlˌswɛɹ./
The most practical lesson is that science should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt ˈsaɪəns ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
Looking at both benefits and risks prevents the discussion from becoming a list of unsupported positive or negative claims.
/ˈlʊkɪŋ æt boʊθ ˈbɛnəfɪts ænd ɹɪsks pɹɪˈvɛnts ðə dɪˈskʌʃən fɹʌm bɪˈkʌmɪŋ ə lɪst əv ʌnsəˈpɔɹtɪd ˈpɑzɪtɪv ɔɹ ˈnɛɡɪtɪv kleɪmz./
Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
02 · Vocabulary
n./phrase · 实验
a key idea used when discussing science
conduct an experiment
n./phrase · 假设
a key idea used when discussing science
test a hypothesis
n. · 解决办法
a way of solving a problem
practical solution
n./v. · 改变
to become different
positive change
n./v. · 支持
help that makes something possible
support an idea
v. · 发展
to grow or become more advanced
develop a skill
n. · 影响；结果
a change caused by something
have an effect on
n. · 观点
what a person thinks about something
express an opinion
adv. · 然而
used to introduce a contrasting idea
however, some people
conj. · 因为
for the reason that
because of
conj. · 尽管
despite the fact that
although it is
v. · 包括
to contain something as a part
include an example
adj. · 重要的
having great value or influence
play an important role
v. · 提供
to give something that is needed
provide evidence
n./v. · 方法；处理
a way of dealing with something
a balanced approach
n./v. · 益处
a helpful or positive effect
bring benefits
n./v. · 挑战
a difficult task that tests ability
face a challenge
03 · Chunks
conduct an experiment实验；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。test a hypothesis假设；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。practical solution解决办法；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。positive change改变；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。support an idea支持；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。develop a skill发展；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。have an effect on影响；结果；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。express an opinion观点；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。04 · Grammar
这个结构负责把事实、原因、条件或立场组织成一个边界清楚的复杂句。
结构：main clause + logical relationship + supporting clause
原文证据：Although the sentence contains two clauses, each clause remains complete and accurately connected.
常见错误：先保证两个分句都完整，再追求句式复杂度；不要用连接词拼接残句。
你的替换：保留结构，把主题换成自己的工作、生活或学习经历。
05 · Pronunciation
练法：慢读单词 → 读完整搭配 → 回到原句；每一步只录一遍，听完再修正。
06 · Spiral review
Day 217、Day 215、Day 211、Day 204、Day 188
07 · Speak with AI
你是我的一对一英语口语教练。今天是 Day 218，主题是 science，程度目标是 B2。
先让我用自己的话复述今天的文章；一次只问一个问题，并等待我回答。
如果我卡住，只给 2–4 个关键词或一个句首，不要直接给完整答案。
请引导我使用这些词：experiment, hypothesis, solution, change, support, develop, effect, opinion, however。
我的回答至少包含：一个事实、一个原因、一个具体例子、一个结果或判断。
每轮结束后只纠正最影响理解的 1 个语法问题和 1 个发音问题，然后让我重新回答同一个问题。
最后让我脱稿回答：How is science connected to your real life, and what have you learned from it?
结束时用中文列出：做得好的证据、需要修正的两点、三个可复用句型、明天应复习的内容。08 · Imitation
必须回收
experiment, hypothesis, solution, change, support, develop, effect, opinion, however09 · Three-hour path