今天先读文章。所有语法、词汇、短语和发音都从这篇文章里学，不需要先读一页操作说明。
01 · Anchor passage
Two reports described the same protest differently by choosing different images and interviewees.
/tu ɹɪˈpɔɹts dɪˈskɹaɪbd ðə seɪm ˈpɹoʊtɛst ˈdɪfɹəntli baɪ ˈt͡ʃuzɪŋ ˈdɪfɹənt ˈɪmɪd͡ʒɪz ænd ɪntɚvjuˈiz./
有两份报告通过选择不同的图像和受访者，对同一抗议作了不同的描述。
Two reports described the — 保留结构，替换真实细节。At first, this looked like a small decision about media, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈmidiə, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
起初，这看起来像是一个关于媒体的小决定，但其结果很快就变得显而易见。
At first — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case raises a broader question: how media selection shapes public attention.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ˈmidiə səˈlɛkʃən ʃeɪps ˈpʌblɪk əˈtɛnʃən./
该案提出了一个更广泛的问题：媒体的选择如何塑造公众的注意力。
question — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The sentence is accurate only when its subject, verb, articles, and clause boundaries all work together.
/ðə ˈsɛntəns ɪz ˈækjɚɪt ˈoʊnli wɛn ɪts ˈsʌbd͡ʒɪkt, vɚb, ˈɑɹtɪkəlz, ænd klɔz ˈbaʊndɚiz ɔl wɚk təˈɡɛðɚ./
句子只有在其主体，动词，文章，条款的界限全部合作时才准确。
The sentence is accurate — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The example draws attention to a target audience, which can shape how people respond to media.
/ðə ɪɡˈzæmpəl dɹɔz əˈtɛnʃən tə ə ˈtɑɹɡət ˈɔdiəns, wɪt͡ʃ kən ʃeɪp haʊ ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈmidiə./
这个例子提请人们注意一个目标受众，这可以决定人们如何应对媒体。
target audience — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A closer look at a media coverage reveals a practical side of media that general opinions often miss.
/ə ˈkloʊsɚ lʊk æt ə ˈmidiə ˈkʌvɚɪd͡ʒ ɹɪˈvilz ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl saɪd əv ˈmidiə ðæt ˈd͡ʒɛnɚəl əˈpɪnjənz ˈɔftən mɪs./
仔细观察媒体报道，就会发现一般观点常常忽视的媒体实用性的一面。
media coverage — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Institutions should implement a policy on media only after consulting the people affected.
/ˌɪnstɪˈtuʃənz ʃʊd ˈɪmpləmɛnt ə ˈpɑlɪsi ɔn ˈmidiə ˈoʊnli ˈæftɚ kənˈsʌltɪŋ ðə ˈpipəl əˈfɛktɪd./
机构应仅在咨询受影响人群后才实施媒体政策。
implement a policy — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People can evaluate a decision about media by comparing its goal, cost, and result.
/ˈpipəl kən ɪˈvæljuˌeɪt ə dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈmidiə baɪ kəmˈpɛɹɪŋ ɪts ɡoʊl, kɔst, ænd ɹɪˈzʌlt./
人们可以通过比较媒体决策的目标、成本和结果来评估媒体决策。
evaluate — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When discussing media, people should explain why a viable solution matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈmidiə, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ə ˈvaɪəbəl səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz./
在讨论媒体时，人们应该解释一个可行的解决办法为何重要。
a viable solution — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case shows why a widespread concern matters when people make decisions about media.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ə ˈwaɪdˈspɹɛd kənˈsɚn ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈmidiə./
案件表明，当人们就媒体作出决定时，为什么一个广泛的关切很重要。
widespread concern — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A compelling argument can change how people understand and respond to media.
/ə kəmˈpɛlɪŋ ˈɑɹɡjəmənt kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈmidiə./
令人信服的论点可以改变人们对媒体的理解和反应。
compelling — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Poor communication can undermine trust in decisions about media.
/pʊɹ kəˌmjunɪˈkeɪʃən kən ˈʌndɚˌmaɪn tɹʌst ɪn dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈmidiə./
沟通不畅可能会破坏人们对媒体决策的信任。
undermine trust — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Clear information can facilitate cooperation when a community responds to media.
/klɪɹ ˌɪnfɔɹˈmeɪʃən kən fəˈsɪlɪˌteɪt koʊˌɑpɚˈeɪʃən wɛn ə kəˈmjunɪti ɹɪˈspɑndz tə ˈmidiə./
当社区回应媒体时，清晰的信息可以促进合作。
facilitate — 保留结构，替换真实细节。In practice, an income disparity can connect an individual experience of media with a wider consequence.
/ɪn ˈpɹæktɪs, ən ˈɪŋˌkʌm dɪˈspɛɹəti kən kəˈnɛkt ən ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns əv ˈmidiə wɪθ ə ˈwaɪdɚ ˈkɑnsəkwəns./
在实践中，收入差距可以将个人的媒体体验与更广泛的后果联系起来。
income disparity — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Debates about media become difficult when people treat a partial truth as a complete explanation.
/dɪˈbeɪts əˈbaʊt ˈmidiə bɪˈkʌm ˈdɪfɪkʌlt wɛn ˈpipəl tɹit ə ˈpɑɹʃəl tɹuθ æz ə kəmˈplit ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən./
当人们将部分事实视为完整的解释时，有关媒体的辩论就会变得困难。
Debates about media become — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A stronger position acknowledges a reasonable objection, sets clear limits, and still explains why one conclusion is preferable.
/ə ˈstɹɔŋɡɚ pəˈzɪʃən ækˈnɑlɪd͡ʒɪz ə ˈɹiznəbəl əbˈd͡ʒɛkʃən, sɛts klɪɹ ˈlɪmɪts, ænd stɪl ɪkˈspleɪnz waɪ wʌn kəŋˈkluʒən ɪz ˈpɹɛfɚəbəl./
更强硬的立场承认合理的反对意见，设定明确的限制，并仍然解释为什么一个结论更可取。
clear — 保留结构，替换真实细节。This balance does not weaken the argument; it makes the judgement more precise, credible, and useful.
/ðɪs ˈbæləns dʌz nɑt ˈwikən ðə ˈɑɹɡjəmənt; ɪt meɪks ðə ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt mɔɹ pɹɪˈsaɪs, ˈkɹɛdɪbəl, ænd ˈjusfəl./
这种平衡并不削弱这一论点；它使判断更加准确、可信和有用。
This balance does not — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People usually notice the value of media only after a real event changes their routine.
/ˈpipəl ˈjuʒəli ˈnoʊtɪs ðə ˈvælju əv ˈmidiə ˈoʊnli ˈæftɚ ə ɹil ɪˈvɛnt ˈt͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒɪz ðɛɹ ɹuˈtin./
人们通常只有在真实事件改变他们的日常生活之后才会注意到媒体的价值。
usually — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case shows why a clear explanation matters when people make decisions about media.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ə klɪɹ ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈmidiə./
案件表明，当人们就媒体作出决定时，明确的解释为何重要。
clear — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A useful question about media focuses on what happened, why it matters, and what should happen next.
/ə ˈjusfəl ˈkwɛst͡ʃən əˈbaʊt ˈmidiə ˈfoʊkəsɪz ɔn wʌt ˈhæpənd, waɪ ɪt ˈmætɚz, ænd wʌt ʃʊd ˈhæpən nɛkst./
关于媒体的一个有用的问题集中在发生了什么、为什么重要以及接下来应该发生什么。
question — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A concrete example of media makes the central idea easier to understand and evaluate.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl əv ˈmidiə meɪks ðə ˈsɛntɹəl aɪˈdiə ˈiziɚ tə ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɪˈvæljuˌeɪt./
媒体的具体例子使中心思想更容易理解和评估。
evaluate — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The meaning of media becomes clearer when people connect it to a real experience.
/ðə ˈminɪŋ əv ˈmidiə bɪˈkʌmz ˈklɪɹɚ wɛn ˈpipəl kəˈnɛkt ɪt tə ə ɹil ɪkˈspɪɹiəns./
当人们将媒体与真实的经历联系起来时，媒体的意义就变得更加明确。
meaning — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A balanced approach to media compares benefits, costs, and the needs of different groups.
/ə ˈbælənst əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ tə ˈmidiə kəmˈpɛɹz ˈbɛnəfɪts, kɔsts, ænd ðə nidz əv ˈdɪfɹənt ɡɹups./
平衡的媒体方法会比较不同群体的收益、成本和需求。
a balanced approach — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main benefit of a thoughtful response to media is a result that people can actually observe.
/ðə meɪn ˈbɛnəfɪt əv ə ˈθɔtfəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈmidiə ɪz ə ɹɪˈzʌlt ðæt ˈpipəl kən ˈækt͡ʃəli əbˈzɚv./
对媒体作出深思熟虑的反应的主要好处是人们可以实际观察的结果。
benefit — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main challenge is to respond to media without creating a larger problem elsewhere.
/ðə meɪn ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒ ɪz tə ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈmidiə wɪˈðaʊt kɹiˈeɪtɪŋ ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˈpɹɑbləm ˈɛlˌswɛɹ./
主要的挑战是在别处不造成更大的问题的情况下对媒体作出反应。
challenge — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Strong evidence helps people judge media without relying on a single attractive story.
/stɹɔŋ ˈɛvədəns hɛlps ˈpipəl d͡ʒʌd͡ʒ ˈmidiə wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈlaɪɪŋ ɔn ə ˈsɪŋɡəl əˈtɹæktɪv ˈstɔɹi./
强有力的证据帮助人们在不依赖单一的有吸引力的故事的情况下判断媒体。
strong evidence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People need realistic support to maintain a balance between the benefits and costs of media.
/ˈpipəl nid ˌɹiəˈlɪstɪk səˈpɔɹt tə meɪnˈteɪn ə ˈbæləns bɪˈtwin ðə ˈbɛnəfɪts ænd kɔsts əv ˈmidiə./
人们需要现实的支持来维持媒体的收益和成本之间的平衡。
maintain a balance — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The most practical lesson is that media should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt ˈmidiə ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
最实际的教训是，应当通过实际效果而不是有吸引力的口号来判断媒体。
rather than — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Looking at both benefits and risks prevents the discussion from becoming a list of unsupported positive or negative claims.
/ˈlʊkɪŋ æt boʊθ ˈbɛnəfɪts ænd ɹɪsks pɹɪˈvɛnts ðə dɪˈskʌʃən fɹʌm bɪˈkʌmɪŋ ə lɪst əv ʌnsəˈpɔɹtɪd ˈpɑzɪtɪv ɔɹ ˈnɛɡɪtɪv kleɪmz./
同时考虑收益和风险可以防止讨论变成一系列未经证实的正面或负面主张。
Looking at both benefits — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
好的决定会把明确目标、事实证据、人的真实经验，以及修正薄弱方案的意愿联系起来。
clear — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
当这些部分保持连贯时，无论日常交流还是 IELTS 回答，这个主题都会更容易展开。
When those parts stay — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Two reports described the same protest differently by choosing different images and interviewees.
/tu ɹɪˈpɔɹts dɪˈskɹaɪbd ðə seɪm ˈpɹoʊtɛst ˈdɪfɹəntli baɪ ˈt͡ʃuzɪŋ ˈdɪfɹənt ˈɪmɪd͡ʒɪz ænd ɪntɚvjuˈiz./
At first, this looked like a small decision about media, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈmidiə, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
The case raises a broader question: how media selection shapes public attention.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ˈmidiə səˈlɛkʃən ʃeɪps ˈpʌblɪk əˈtɛnʃən./
The sentence is accurate only when its subject, verb, articles, and clause boundaries all work together.
/ðə ˈsɛntəns ɪz ˈækjɚɪt ˈoʊnli wɛn ɪts ˈsʌbd͡ʒɪkt, vɚb, ˈɑɹtɪkəlz, ænd klɔz ˈbaʊndɚiz ɔl wɚk təˈɡɛðɚ./
The example draws attention to a target audience, which can shape how people respond to media.
/ðə ɪɡˈzæmpəl dɹɔz əˈtɛnʃən tə ə ˈtɑɹɡət ˈɔdiəns, wɪt͡ʃ kən ʃeɪp haʊ ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈmidiə./
A closer look at a media coverage reveals a practical side of media that general opinions often miss.
/ə ˈkloʊsɚ lʊk æt ə ˈmidiə ˈkʌvɚɪd͡ʒ ɹɪˈvilz ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl saɪd əv ˈmidiə ðæt ˈd͡ʒɛnɚəl əˈpɪnjənz ˈɔftən mɪs./
Institutions should implement a policy on media only after consulting the people affected.
/ˌɪnstɪˈtuʃənz ʃʊd ˈɪmpləmɛnt ə ˈpɑlɪsi ɔn ˈmidiə ˈoʊnli ˈæftɚ kənˈsʌltɪŋ ðə ˈpipəl əˈfɛktɪd./
People can evaluate a decision about media by comparing its goal, cost, and result.
/ˈpipəl kən ɪˈvæljuˌeɪt ə dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈmidiə baɪ kəmˈpɛɹɪŋ ɪts ɡoʊl, kɔst, ænd ɹɪˈzʌlt./
When discussing media, people should explain why a viable solution matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈmidiə, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ə ˈvaɪəbəl səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz./
The case shows why a widespread concern matters when people make decisions about media.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ə ˈwaɪdˈspɹɛd kənˈsɚn ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈmidiə./
A compelling argument can change how people understand and respond to media.
/ə kəmˈpɛlɪŋ ˈɑɹɡjəmənt kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈmidiə./
Poor communication can undermine trust in decisions about media.
/pʊɹ kəˌmjunɪˈkeɪʃən kən ˈʌndɚˌmaɪn tɹʌst ɪn dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈmidiə./
Clear information can facilitate cooperation when a community responds to media.
/klɪɹ ˌɪnfɔɹˈmeɪʃən kən fəˈsɪlɪˌteɪt koʊˌɑpɚˈeɪʃən wɛn ə kəˈmjunɪti ɹɪˈspɑndz tə ˈmidiə./
In practice, an income disparity can connect an individual experience of media with a wider consequence.
/ɪn ˈpɹæktɪs, ən ˈɪŋˌkʌm dɪˈspɛɹəti kən kəˈnɛkt ən ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns əv ˈmidiə wɪθ ə ˈwaɪdɚ ˈkɑnsəkwəns./
Debates about media become difficult when people treat a partial truth as a complete explanation.
/dɪˈbeɪts əˈbaʊt ˈmidiə bɪˈkʌm ˈdɪfɪkʌlt wɛn ˈpipəl tɹit ə ˈpɑɹʃəl tɹuθ æz ə kəmˈplit ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən./
A stronger position acknowledges a reasonable objection, sets clear limits, and still explains why one conclusion is preferable.
/ə ˈstɹɔŋɡɚ pəˈzɪʃən ækˈnɑlɪd͡ʒɪz ə ˈɹiznəbəl əbˈd͡ʒɛkʃən, sɛts klɪɹ ˈlɪmɪts, ænd stɪl ɪkˈspleɪnz waɪ wʌn kəŋˈkluʒən ɪz ˈpɹɛfɚəbəl./
This balance does not weaken the argument; it makes the judgement more precise, credible, and useful.
/ðɪs ˈbæləns dʌz nɑt ˈwikən ðə ˈɑɹɡjəmənt; ɪt meɪks ðə ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt mɔɹ pɹɪˈsaɪs, ˈkɹɛdɪbəl, ænd ˈjusfəl./
People usually notice the value of media only after a real event changes their routine.
/ˈpipəl ˈjuʒəli ˈnoʊtɪs ðə ˈvælju əv ˈmidiə ˈoʊnli ˈæftɚ ə ɹil ɪˈvɛnt ˈt͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒɪz ðɛɹ ɹuˈtin./
The case shows why a clear explanation matters when people make decisions about media.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ə klɪɹ ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈmidiə./
A useful question about media focuses on what happened, why it matters, and what should happen next.
/ə ˈjusfəl ˈkwɛst͡ʃən əˈbaʊt ˈmidiə ˈfoʊkəsɪz ɔn wʌt ˈhæpənd, waɪ ɪt ˈmætɚz, ænd wʌt ʃʊd ˈhæpən nɛkst./
A concrete example of media makes the central idea easier to understand and evaluate.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl əv ˈmidiə meɪks ðə ˈsɛntɹəl aɪˈdiə ˈiziɚ tə ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɪˈvæljuˌeɪt./
The meaning of media becomes clearer when people connect it to a real experience.
/ðə ˈminɪŋ əv ˈmidiə bɪˈkʌmz ˈklɪɹɚ wɛn ˈpipəl kəˈnɛkt ɪt tə ə ɹil ɪkˈspɪɹiəns./
A balanced approach to media compares benefits, costs, and the needs of different groups.
/ə ˈbælənst əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ tə ˈmidiə kəmˈpɛɹz ˈbɛnəfɪts, kɔsts, ænd ðə nidz əv ˈdɪfɹənt ɡɹups./
The main benefit of a thoughtful response to media is a result that people can actually observe.
/ðə meɪn ˈbɛnəfɪt əv ə ˈθɔtfəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈmidiə ɪz ə ɹɪˈzʌlt ðæt ˈpipəl kən ˈækt͡ʃəli əbˈzɚv./
The main challenge is to respond to media without creating a larger problem elsewhere.
/ðə meɪn ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒ ɪz tə ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈmidiə wɪˈðaʊt kɹiˈeɪtɪŋ ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˈpɹɑbləm ˈɛlˌswɛɹ./
Strong evidence helps people judge media without relying on a single attractive story.
/stɹɔŋ ˈɛvədəns hɛlps ˈpipəl d͡ʒʌd͡ʒ ˈmidiə wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈlaɪɪŋ ɔn ə ˈsɪŋɡəl əˈtɹæktɪv ˈstɔɹi./
People need realistic support to maintain a balance between the benefits and costs of media.
/ˈpipəl nid ˌɹiəˈlɪstɪk səˈpɔɹt tə meɪnˈteɪn ə ˈbæləns bɪˈtwin ðə ˈbɛnəfɪts ænd kɔsts əv ˈmidiə./
The most practical lesson is that media should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt ˈmidiə ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
Looking at both benefits and risks prevents the discussion from becoming a list of unsupported positive or negative claims.
/ˈlʊkɪŋ æt boʊθ ˈbɛnəfɪts ænd ɹɪsks pɹɪˈvɛnts ðə dɪˈskʌʃən fɹʌm bɪˈkʌmɪŋ ə lɪst əv ʌnsəˈpɔɹtɪd ˈpɑzɪtɪv ɔɹ ˈnɛɡɪtɪv kleɪmz./
Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
02 · Vocabulary
n./phrase · 受众
a key idea used when discussing media
target audience
n./phrase · 报道
a key idea used when discussing media
media coverage
v. · 实施
to put a plan into action
implement a policy
v. · 评估
to judge quality using evidence
evaluate an outcome
adj. · 可行的
capable of working successfully
a viable solution
adj. · 广泛的
existing over a large area or among many people
widespread concern
adj. · 有说服力的
strong enough to convince
compelling evidence
v. · 削弱
to make something gradually weaker
undermine trust
v. · 促进
to make an action easier
facilitate learning
n. · 差距
a noticeable and often unfair difference
income disparity
adv. · 通常
in the way that happens most often
usually study
adj. · 清楚的
easy to hear or understand
a clear answer
n. · 问题
a sentence that asks for information
ask a question
n. · 例子
something that shows what you mean
give an example
n. · 意思
the idea expressed by a word
guess the meaning
n./v. · 方法；处理
a way of dealing with something
a balanced approach
n./v. · 益处
a helpful or positive effect
bring benefits
n./v. · 挑战
a difficult task that tests ability
face a challenge
n. · 证据
facts that support a claim
strong evidence
v. · 维持
to keep something at the same level
maintain a balance
03 · Chunks
target audience受众；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。media coverage报道；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。implement a policy实施；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。evaluate an outcome评估；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。a viable solution可行的；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。widespread concern广泛的；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。compelling evidence有说服力的；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。undermine trust削弱；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。04 · Grammar
这个结构负责把事实、原因、条件或立场组织成一个边界清楚的复杂句。
结构：main clause + logical relationship + supporting clause
原文证据：The sentence is accurate only when its subject, verb, articles, and clause boundaries all work together.
常见错误：先保证两个分句都完整，再追求句式复杂度；不要用连接词拼接残句。
你的替换：保留结构，把主题换成自己的工作、生活或学习经历。
05 · Pronunciation
练法：慢读单词 → 读完整搭配 → 回到原句；每一步只录一遍，听完再修正。
06 · Spiral review
Day 304、Day 302、Day 298、Day 291、Day 275
07 · Speak with AI
你是我的一对一英语口语教练。今天是 Day 305，主题是 media，程度目标是 B2+。
先让我用自己的话复述今天的文章；一次只问一个问题，并等待我回答。
如果我卡住，只给 2–4 个关键词或一个句首，不要直接给完整答案。
请引导我使用这些词：audience, coverage, implement, evaluate, viable, widespread, compelling, undermine, facilitate, disparity, usually。
我的回答至少包含：一个事实、一个原因、一个具体例子、一个结果或判断。
每轮结束后只纠正最影响理解的 1 个语法问题和 1 个发音问题，然后让我重新回答同一个问题。
最后让我脱稿回答：How is media connected to your real life, and what have you learned from it?
结束时用中文列出：做得好的证据、需要修正的两点、三个可复用句型、明天应复习的内容。08 · Imitation
必须回收
audience, coverage, implement, evaluate, viable, widespread, compelling, undermine, facilitate, disparity, usually09 · Three-hour path