今天先读文章。所有语法、词汇、短语和发音都从这篇文章里学，不需要先读一页操作说明。
01 · Anchor passage
A class repeated a plant-growth experiment because the first result came from only three samples.
/ə klæs ɹɪˈpitɪd ə plænt ɡɹoʊθ ɪkˈspɛɹɪmənt bɪˈkʌz ðə fɚst ɹɪˈzʌlt keɪm fɹʌm ˈoʊnli θɹi ˈsæmpəlz./
一个班级重复了植物生长实验，因为第一个结果仅来自三个样本。
experiment — 保留结构，替换真实细节。At first, this looked like a small decision about science, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
起初，这看起来像是一个关于科学的小决定，但其结果很快就变得可见。
At first — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case raises a broader question: how evidence and testing improve explanations.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ˈɛvədəns ænd ˈtɛstɪŋ ɪmˈpɹuv ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃənz./
该案提出了一个更广泛的问题：证据和检验如何改进解释。
evidence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People discuss science whenever it affects their everyday choices.
/ˈpipəl dɪˈskʌs ˈsaɪəns wɛˈnɛvɚ ɪt əˈfɛkts ðɛɹ ˈɛvɹiˈdeɪ ˈt͡ʃɔɪsɪz./
每当科学影响他们的日常选择时，人们就会讨论科学。
People discuss science whenever — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The example draws attention to a conduct an experiment, which can shape how people respond to science.
/ðə ɪɡˈzæmpəl dɹɔz əˈtɛnʃən tə ə ˈkɑndʌkt ən ɪkˈspɛɹɪmənt, wɪt͡ʃ kən ʃeɪp haʊ ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns./
这个例子引起人们注意进行一个实验，可以决定人们如何对科学作出反应。
conduct an experiment — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People can test a hypothesis when a real situation involving science requires action.
/ˈpipəl kən tɛst ə haɪˈpɑθəsəs wɛn ə ɹil ˌsɪt͡ʃuˈeɪʃən ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ ˈsaɪəns ɹiˈkwaɪɚz ˈækʃən./
当涉及科学的真实情况需要采取行动时，人们可以检验假设。
test a hypothesis — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main benefit of a thoughtful response to science is a result that people can actually observe.
/ðə meɪn ˈbɛnəfɪt əv ə ˈθɔtfəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈsaɪəns ɪz ə ɹɪˈzʌlt ðæt ˈpipəl kən ˈækt͡ʃəli əbˈzɚv./
深思熟虑的对科学的反应的主要好处是人们可以实际观察的结果。
benefit — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main challenge is to respond to science without creating a larger problem elsewhere.
/ðə meɪn ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒ ɪz tə ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns wɪˈðaʊt kɹiˈeɪtɪŋ ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˈpɹɑbləm ˈɛlˌswɛɹ./
主要的挑战在于在别处不造成更大的问题的情况下对科学作出反应。
challenge — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Strong evidence helps people judge science without relying on a single attractive story.
/stɹɔŋ ˈɛvədəns hɛlps ˈpipəl d͡ʒʌd͡ʒ ˈsaɪəns wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈlaɪɪŋ ɔn ə ˈsɪŋɡəl əˈtɹæktɪv ˈstɔɹi./
强有力的证据帮助人们在不依赖单一的有吸引力的故事的情况下判断科学。
strong evidence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The results indicate that the effects of science are not identical for every group.
/ðə ɹɪˈzʌlts ˈɪndɪˌkeɪt ðæt ðə ɪˈfɛkts əv ˈsaɪəns ɑɹ nɑt aɪˈdɛntɪkəl fɚ ˈɛvɹi ɡɹup./
结果表明，科学对每个群体的影响并不相同。
results indicate — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Several personal and social factors contribute to how people experience science.
/ˈsɛvɚəl ˈpɚsənəl ænd ˈsoʊʃəl ˈfæktɚz kənˈtɹɪbjut tə haʊ ˈpipəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ˈsaɪəns./
有几个个人和社会因素影响人们体验科学的方式。
contribute to — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People need realistic support to maintain a balance between the benefits and costs of science.
/ˈpipəl nid ˌɹiəˈlɪstɪk səˈpɔɹt tə meɪnˈteɪn ə ˈbæləns bɪˈtwin ðə ˈbɛnəfɪts ænd kɔsts əv ˈsaɪəns./
人们需要现实的支持来维持科学的收益和成本之间的平衡。
maintain a balance — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A serious problem involving science may require attention from both individuals and institutions.
/ə ˈsɪɹiəs ˈpɹɑbləm ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ ˈsaɪəns meɪ ɹɪˈkwaɪɚ əˈtɛnʃən fɹʌm boʊθ ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəlz ænd ˌɪnstɪˈtuʃənz./
涉及科学的严重问题可能需要个人和机构的关注。
require attention — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Available information can change how people understand and respond to science.
/əˈveɪləbəl ˌɪnfɔɹˈmeɪʃən kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns./
可用信息可以改变人们理解和响应科学的方式。
available — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Debates about science become difficult when people treat a partial truth as a complete explanation.
/dɪˈbeɪts əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns bɪˈkʌm ˈdɪfɪkʌlt wɛn ˈpipəl tɹit ə ˈpɑɹʃəl tɹuθ æz ə kəmˈplit ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən./
当人们将部分真理视为完整的解释时，有关科学的辩论就会变得困难。
Debates about science become — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A stronger position acknowledges a reasonable objection, sets clear limits, and still explains why one conclusion is preferable.
/ə ˈstɹɔŋɡɚ pəˈzɪʃən ækˈnɑlɪd͡ʒɪz ə ˈɹiznəbəl əbˈd͡ʒɛkʃən, sɛts klɪɹ ˈlɪmɪts, ænd stɪl ɪkˈspleɪnz waɪ wʌn kəŋˈkluʒən ɪz ˈpɹɛfɚəbəl./
更强硬的立场承认合理的反对意见，设定明确的限制，并仍然解释为什么一个结论更可取。
clear — 保留结构，替换真实细节。This balance does not weaken the argument; it makes the judgement more precise, credible, and useful.
/ðɪs ˈbæləns dʌz nɑt ˈwikən ðə ˈɑɹɡjəmənt; ɪt meɪks ðə ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt mɔɹ pɹɪˈsaɪs, ˈkɹɛdɪbəl, ænd ˈjusfəl./
这种平衡并不削弱这一论点；它使判断更加准确、可信和有用。
This balance does not — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When discussing science, people should explain why a particular experience matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈsaɪəns, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ə pɚˈtɪkjəlɚ ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ˈmætɚz./
在讨论科学时，人们应该解释一个特定的经验为何重要。
particular — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case shows why an alternative solution matters when people make decisions about science.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ən ɔlˈtɚnɪtɪv səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns./
案件表明，当人们就科学作出决定时，替代解决办法为何重要。
alternative — 保留结构，替换真实细节。An individual experience can change how people understand and respond to science.
/ən ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns./
个人经历可以改变人们对科学的理解和反应。
individual — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People may judge the importance of a local community differently because their needs and resources are not identical.
/ˈpipəl meɪ d͡ʒʌd͡ʒ ðə ɪmˈpɔɹtəns əv ə ˈloʊkəl kəˈmjunɪti ˈdɪfɹəntli bɪˈkʌz ðɛɹ nidz ænd ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ɑɹ nɑt aɪˈdɛntɪkəl./
人们可能会以不同的方式判断当地社区的重要性，因为他们的需求和资源并不相同。
local community — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case shows why an efficient solution matters when people make decisions about science.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ən ɪˈfɪʃənt səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns./
案件表明，当人们就科学作出决定时，有效的解决方案为何重要。
efficient — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A possible solution can change how people understand and respond to science.
/ə ˈpɑsəbəl səˈluʃən kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns./
一个可能的解决方案可以改变人们对科学的理解和反应。
possible — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A concrete example can provide evidence for a claim about science.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən pɹəˈvaɪd ˈɛvədəns fɚ ə kleɪm əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns./
一个具体的例子可以为有关科学的主张提供证据。
evidence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A balanced approach to science compares benefits, costs, and the needs of different groups.
/ə ˈbælənst əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ tə ˈsaɪəns kəmˈpɛɹz ˈbɛnəfɪts, kɔsts, ænd ðə nidz əv ˈdɪfɹənt ɡɹups./
平衡的科学方法会比较不同群体的收益、成本和需求。
a balanced approach — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A clear explanation can change how people understand and respond to science.
/ə klɪɹ ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns./
清晰的解释可以改变人们对科学的理解和反应。
clear — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A concrete example of science makes the central idea easier to understand and evaluate.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl əv ˈsaɪəns meɪks ðə ˈsɛntɹəl aɪˈdiə ˈiziɚ tə ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɪˈvæljuˌeɪt./
科学的具体例子使中心思想更容易理解和评估。
example — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The most practical lesson is that science should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt ˈsaɪəns ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
最实际的教训是，科学应该通过实际效果而不是有吸引力的口号来判断。
rather than — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The people most affected should be heard before a convenient solution is presented as a universal answer.
/ðə ˈpipəl moʊst əˈfɛktɪd ʃʊd bi hɚd bɪˈfɔɹ ə kənˈvinjənt səˈluʃən ɪz pɹɪˈzɛntɪd æz ə ˌjunəˈvɚsəl ˈænsɚ./
在提出一个方便的解决办法作为普遍答案之前，应听取受影响最大的人民的意见。
The people most affected — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Short-term measurements reveal immediate movement, while repeated observations show whether the change is likely to last.
/ʃɔɹt tɚm ˈmɛʒɚmənts ɹɪˈvil ɪˈmidiɪt ˈmuvmənt, waɪl ɹɪˈpitɪd ˌɑbzɚˈveɪʃənz ʃoʊ ˈwɛðɚ ðə t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪz ˈlaɪkli tə læst./
短期测量揭示了即时的变化，而重复观察则表明变化是否可能持续。
Short term measurements reveal — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
好的决定会把明确目标、事实证据、人的真实经验，以及修正薄弱方案的意愿联系起来。
evidence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
当这些部分保持连贯时，无论日常交流还是 IELTS 回答，这个主题都会更容易展开。
When those parts stay — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A class repeated a plant-growth experiment because the first result came from only three samples.
/ə klæs ɹɪˈpitɪd ə plænt ɡɹoʊθ ɪkˈspɛɹɪmənt bɪˈkʌz ðə fɚst ɹɪˈzʌlt keɪm fɹʌm ˈoʊnli θɹi ˈsæmpəlz./
At first, this looked like a small decision about science, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
The case raises a broader question: how evidence and testing improve explanations.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ˈɛvədəns ænd ˈtɛstɪŋ ɪmˈpɹuv ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃənz./
People discuss science whenever it affects their everyday choices.
/ˈpipəl dɪˈskʌs ˈsaɪəns wɛˈnɛvɚ ɪt əˈfɛkts ðɛɹ ˈɛvɹiˈdeɪ ˈt͡ʃɔɪsɪz./
The example draws attention to a conduct an experiment, which can shape how people respond to science.
/ðə ɪɡˈzæmpəl dɹɔz əˈtɛnʃən tə ə ˈkɑndʌkt ən ɪkˈspɛɹɪmənt, wɪt͡ʃ kən ʃeɪp haʊ ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns./
People can test a hypothesis when a real situation involving science requires action.
/ˈpipəl kən tɛst ə haɪˈpɑθəsəs wɛn ə ɹil ˌsɪt͡ʃuˈeɪʃən ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ ˈsaɪəns ɹiˈkwaɪɚz ˈækʃən./
The main benefit of a thoughtful response to science is a result that people can actually observe.
/ðə meɪn ˈbɛnəfɪt əv ə ˈθɔtfəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈsaɪəns ɪz ə ɹɪˈzʌlt ðæt ˈpipəl kən ˈækt͡ʃəli əbˈzɚv./
The main challenge is to respond to science without creating a larger problem elsewhere.
/ðə meɪn ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒ ɪz tə ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns wɪˈðaʊt kɹiˈeɪtɪŋ ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˈpɹɑbləm ˈɛlˌswɛɹ./
Strong evidence helps people judge science without relying on a single attractive story.
/stɹɔŋ ˈɛvədəns hɛlps ˈpipəl d͡ʒʌd͡ʒ ˈsaɪəns wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈlaɪɪŋ ɔn ə ˈsɪŋɡəl əˈtɹæktɪv ˈstɔɹi./
The results indicate that the effects of science are not identical for every group.
/ðə ɹɪˈzʌlts ˈɪndɪˌkeɪt ðæt ðə ɪˈfɛkts əv ˈsaɪəns ɑɹ nɑt aɪˈdɛntɪkəl fɚ ˈɛvɹi ɡɹup./
Several personal and social factors contribute to how people experience science.
/ˈsɛvɚəl ˈpɚsənəl ænd ˈsoʊʃəl ˈfæktɚz kənˈtɹɪbjut tə haʊ ˈpipəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ˈsaɪəns./
People need realistic support to maintain a balance between the benefits and costs of science.
/ˈpipəl nid ˌɹiəˈlɪstɪk səˈpɔɹt tə meɪnˈteɪn ə ˈbæləns bɪˈtwin ðə ˈbɛnəfɪts ænd kɔsts əv ˈsaɪəns./
A serious problem involving science may require attention from both individuals and institutions.
/ə ˈsɪɹiəs ˈpɹɑbləm ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ ˈsaɪəns meɪ ɹɪˈkwaɪɚ əˈtɛnʃən fɹʌm boʊθ ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəlz ænd ˌɪnstɪˈtuʃənz./
Available information can change how people understand and respond to science.
/əˈveɪləbəl ˌɪnfɔɹˈmeɪʃən kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns./
Debates about science become difficult when people treat a partial truth as a complete explanation.
/dɪˈbeɪts əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns bɪˈkʌm ˈdɪfɪkʌlt wɛn ˈpipəl tɹit ə ˈpɑɹʃəl tɹuθ æz ə kəmˈplit ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən./
A stronger position acknowledges a reasonable objection, sets clear limits, and still explains why one conclusion is preferable.
/ə ˈstɹɔŋɡɚ pəˈzɪʃən ækˈnɑlɪd͡ʒɪz ə ˈɹiznəbəl əbˈd͡ʒɛkʃən, sɛts klɪɹ ˈlɪmɪts, ænd stɪl ɪkˈspleɪnz waɪ wʌn kəŋˈkluʒən ɪz ˈpɹɛfɚəbəl./
This balance does not weaken the argument; it makes the judgement more precise, credible, and useful.
/ðɪs ˈbæləns dʌz nɑt ˈwikən ðə ˈɑɹɡjəmənt; ɪt meɪks ðə ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt mɔɹ pɹɪˈsaɪs, ˈkɹɛdɪbəl, ænd ˈjusfəl./
When discussing science, people should explain why a particular experience matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈsaɪəns, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ə pɚˈtɪkjəlɚ ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ˈmætɚz./
The case shows why an alternative solution matters when people make decisions about science.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ən ɔlˈtɚnɪtɪv səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns./
An individual experience can change how people understand and respond to science.
/ən ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns./
People may judge the importance of a local community differently because their needs and resources are not identical.
/ˈpipəl meɪ d͡ʒʌd͡ʒ ðə ɪmˈpɔɹtəns əv ə ˈloʊkəl kəˈmjunɪti ˈdɪfɹəntli bɪˈkʌz ðɛɹ nidz ænd ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ɑɹ nɑt aɪˈdɛntɪkəl./
The case shows why an efficient solution matters when people make decisions about science.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ən ɪˈfɪʃənt səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns./
A possible solution can change how people understand and respond to science.
/ə ˈpɑsəbəl səˈluʃən kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns./
A concrete example can provide evidence for a claim about science.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən pɹəˈvaɪd ˈɛvədəns fɚ ə kleɪm əˈbaʊt ˈsaɪəns./
A balanced approach to science compares benefits, costs, and the needs of different groups.
/ə ˈbælənst əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ tə ˈsaɪəns kəmˈpɛɹz ˈbɛnəfɪts, kɔsts, ænd ðə nidz əv ˈdɪfɹənt ɡɹups./
A clear explanation can change how people understand and respond to science.
/ə klɪɹ ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈsaɪəns./
A concrete example of science makes the central idea easier to understand and evaluate.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl əv ˈsaɪəns meɪks ðə ˈsɛntɹəl aɪˈdiə ˈiziɚ tə ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɪˈvæljuˌeɪt./
The most practical lesson is that science should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt ˈsaɪəns ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
The people most affected should be heard before a convenient solution is presented as a universal answer.
/ðə ˈpipəl moʊst əˈfɛktɪd ʃʊd bi hɚd bɪˈfɔɹ ə kənˈvinjənt səˈluʃən ɪz pɹɪˈzɛntɪd æz ə ˌjunəˈvɚsəl ˈænsɚ./
Short-term measurements reveal immediate movement, while repeated observations show whether the change is likely to last.
/ʃɔɹt tɚm ˈmɛʒɚmənts ɹɪˈvil ɪˈmidiɪt ˈmuvmənt, waɪl ɹɪˈpitɪd ˌɑbzɚˈveɪʃənz ʃoʊ ˈwɛðɚ ðə t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪz ˈlaɪkli tə læst./
Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
02 · Vocabulary
n./phrase · 实验
a key idea used when discussing science
conduct an experiment
n./phrase · 假设
a key idea used when discussing science
test a hypothesis
n./v. · 益处
a helpful or positive effect
bring benefits
n./v. · 挑战
a difficult task that tests ability
face a challenge
n. · 证据
facts that support a claim
strong evidence
v. · 表明
to show that something is true
results indicate
v. · 促成；贡献
to help cause or achieve something
contribute to
v. · 维持
to keep something at the same level
maintain a balance
v. · 需要
to need something
require attention
adj. · 可获得的
ready to be used or obtained
widely available
adj. · 特定的
specific rather than general
a particular case
n./adj. · 替代方案
another possible choice
an alternative method
n./adj. · 个人；个体的
one person considered separately
individual needs
n. · 社区
people living or working together
local community
adj. · 高效的
working well without waste
an efficient system
adj. · 可能的
able to happen or be done
as soon as possible
v. · 提供
to give something that is needed
provide evidence
n./v. · 方法；处理
a way of dealing with something
a balanced approach
adj. · 清楚的
easy to hear or understand
a clear answer
n. · 例子
something that shows what you mean
give an example
03 · Chunks
conduct an experiment实验；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。test a hypothesis假设；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。bring benefits益处；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。face a challenge挑战；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。strong evidence证据；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。results indicate表明；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。contribute to促成；贡献；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。maintain a balance维持；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。04 · Grammar
描述习惯、事实和稳定状态。
结构：Subject + base verb(s)
原文证据：People discuss science whenever it affects their everyday choices.
常见错误：第三人称单数不要漏掉 -s。
你的替换：保留结构，把主题换成自己的工作、生活或学习经历。
05 · Pronunciation
练法：慢读单词 → 读完整搭配 → 回到原句；每一步只录一遍，听完再修正。
06 · Spiral review
Day 310、Day 308、Day 304、Day 297、Day 281
07 · Speak with AI
你是我的一对一英语口语教练。今天是 Day 311，主题是 science，程度目标是 B2+。
先让我用自己的话复述今天的文章；一次只问一个问题，并等待我回答。
如果我卡住，只给 2–4 个关键词或一个句首，不要直接给完整答案。
请引导我使用这些词：experiment, hypothesis, benefit, challenge, evidence, indicate, contribute, maintain, require, available, particular。
我的回答至少包含：一个事实、一个原因、一个具体例子、一个结果或判断。
每轮结束后只纠正最影响理解的 1 个语法问题和 1 个发音问题，然后让我重新回答同一个问题。
最后让我脱稿回答：How is science connected to your real life, and what have you learned from it?
结束时用中文列出：做得好的证据、需要修正的两点、三个可复用句型、明天应复习的内容。08 · Imitation
必须回收
experiment, hypothesis, benefit, challenge, evidence, indicate, contribute, maintain, require, available, particular09 · Three-hour path