今天先读文章。所有语法、词汇、短语和发音都从这篇文章里学，不需要先读一页操作说明。
01 · Anchor passage
A road project added safe crossings where camera data showed animals regularly moving between habitats.
/ə ɹoʊd ˈpɹɑd͡ʒɛkt ˈædɪd seɪf ˈkɹɔsɪŋz wɛɹ ˈkæmɚə ˈdætə ʃoʊd ˈænəməlz ˈɹɛɡjəlɚli ˈmuvɪŋ bɪˈtwin ˈhæbəˌtæts./
一个道路项目增加了安全十字路口，摄像头数据显示动物经常在栖息地之间移动。
A road project added — 保留结构，替换真实细节。At first, this looked like a small decision about wildlife, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
起初，这看起来像是一个关于野生动物的小决定，但其结果很快就变得显而易见。
At first — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case raises a broader question: how habitat protection supports biodiversity.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ˈhæbəˌtæt pɹəˈtɛkʃən səˈpɔɹts ˌbaɪoʊdaɪˈvɚsəti./
这一案例提出了一个更广泛的问题：生境保护如何支持生物多样性。
biodiversity — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Admittedly, one response may create benefits; nevertheless, the strongest counterargument still deserves an answer.
/ædˈmɪtɪdli, wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns meɪ kɹiˈeɪt ˈbɛnəfɪts; ˌnɛvɚðəˈlɛs, ðə ˈstɹɔŋɡɪst ˈkaʊntɚˌɑɹɡjəmənt stɪl dɪˈzɚvz ən ˈænsɚ./
诚然，一种回应可能会带来好处；但另一种回应可能会带来好处。尽管如此，最强烈的反驳仍然值得回答。
Admittedly one response may — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People can protect biodiversity when a real situation involving wildlife requires action.
/ˈpipəl kən pɹəˈtɛkt ˌbaɪoʊdaɪˈvɚsəti wɛn ə ɹil ˌsɪt͡ʃuˈeɪʃən ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ɹiˈkwaɪɚz ˈækʃən./
当涉及野生动物的实际情况需要采取行动时，人们可以保护生物多样性。
protect biodiversity — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A closer look at endangered species reveals a practical side of wildlife that general opinions often miss.
/ə ˈkloʊsɚ lʊk æt ɪnˈdeɪnd͡ʒɚd ˈspiʃiz ɹɪˈvilz ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl saɪd əv ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ðæt ˈd͡ʒɛnɚəl əˈpɪnjənz ˈɔftən mɪs./
仔细观察濒临灭绝的物种，可以发现野生动物的实际一面，而一般观点常常忽视这一面。
endangered species — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main challenge is to respond to wildlife without creating a larger problem elsewhere.
/ðə meɪn ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒ ɪz tə ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf wɪˈðaʊt kɹiˈeɪtɪŋ ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˈpɹɑbləm ˈɛlˌswɛɹ./
主要的挑战在于应对野生动物而不在别处造成更大的问题。
challenge — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Strong evidence helps people judge wildlife without relying on a single attractive story.
/stɹɔŋ ˈɛvədəns hɛlps ˈpipəl d͡ʒʌd͡ʒ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈlaɪɪŋ ɔn ə ˈsɪŋɡəl əˈtɹæktɪv ˈstɔɹi./
强有力的证据帮助人们在不依赖单一的有吸引力的故事的情况下判断野生动物。
strong evidence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The results indicate that the effects of wildlife are not identical for every group.
/ðə ɹɪˈzʌlts ˈɪndɪˌkeɪt ðæt ðə ɪˈfɛkts əv ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ɑɹ nɑt aɪˈdɛntɪkəl fɚ ˈɛvɹi ɡɹup./
结果显示，野生生物对每个群体的影响并不相同。
results indicate — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Several personal and social factors contribute to how people experience wildlife.
/ˈsɛvɚəl ˈpɚsənəl ænd ˈsoʊʃəl ˈfæktɚz kənˈtɹɪbjut tə haʊ ˈpipəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
有几个个人和社会因素影响着人们体验野生动物的方式。
contribute to — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People need realistic support to maintain a balance between the benefits and costs of wildlife.
/ˈpipəl nid ˌɹiəˈlɪstɪk səˈpɔɹt tə meɪnˈteɪn ə ˈbæləns bɪˈtwin ðə ˈbɛnəfɪts ænd kɔsts əv ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
人们需要现实的支持来维持野生动物的利益和成本之间的平衡。
maintain a balance — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A serious problem involving wildlife may require attention from both individuals and institutions.
/ə ˈsɪɹiəs ˈpɹɑbləm ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf meɪ ɹɪˈkwaɪɚ əˈtɛnʃən fɹʌm boʊθ ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəlz ænd ˌɪnstɪˈtuʃənz./
涉及野生动物的严重问题可能需要个人和机构的关注。
require attention — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Available information can change how people understand and respond to wildlife.
/əˈveɪləbəl ˌɪnfɔɹˈmeɪʃən kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
现有信息可以改变人们对野生动物的理解和反应。
available — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A particular experience can change how people understand and respond to wildlife.
/ə pɚˈtɪkjəlɚ ɪkˈspɪɹiəns kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
特定的经历可以改变人们对野生动物的理解和反应。
particular — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Debates about wildlife become difficult when people treat a partial truth as a complete explanation.
/dɪˈbeɪts əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf bɪˈkʌm ˈdɪfɪkʌlt wɛn ˈpipəl tɹit ə ˈpɑɹʃəl tɹuθ æz ə kəmˈplit ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən./
当人们将部分事实视为完整的解释时，有关野生动物的争论就会变得困难。
Debates about wildlife become — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A stronger position acknowledges a reasonable objection, sets clear limits, and still explains why one conclusion is preferable.
/ə ˈstɹɔŋɡɚ pəˈzɪʃən ækˈnɑlɪd͡ʒɪz ə ˈɹiznəbəl əbˈd͡ʒɛkʃən, sɛts klɪɹ ˈlɪmɪts, ænd stɪl ɪkˈspleɪnz waɪ wʌn kəŋˈkluʒən ɪz ˈpɹɛfɚəbəl./
更强硬的立场承认合理的反对意见，设定明确的限制，并仍然解释为什么一个结论更可取。
A stronger position acknowledges — 保留结构，替换真实细节。This balance does not weaken the argument; it makes the judgement more precise, credible, and useful.
/ðɪs ˈbæləns dʌz nɑt ˈwikən ðə ˈɑɹɡjəmənt; ɪt meɪks ðə ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt mɔɹ pɹɪˈsaɪs, ˈkɹɛdɪbəl, ænd ˈjusfəl./
这种平衡并不削弱这一论点；它使判断更加准确、可信和有用。
This balance does not — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When discussing wildlife, people should explain why an alternative solution matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ən ɔlˈtɚnɪtɪv səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz./
在讨论野生生物时，人们应该解释为什么替代解决办法很重要。
alternative — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case shows why an individual experience matters when people make decisions about wildlife.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ən ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
案件表明，当人们就野生动物作出决定时，个人的经验为何重要。
individual — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Without considering a local community, an important part of the discussion about wildlife would remain incomplete.
/wɪˈðaʊt kənˈsɪdɚɪŋ ə ˈloʊkəl kəˈmjunɪti, ən ɪmˈpɔɹtənt pɑɹt əv ðə dɪˈskʌʃən əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf wʊd ɹɪˈmeɪn ɪŋkəmˈplit./
如果不考虑当地社区的问题，关于野生动物的讨论的一个重要部分将仍然是不完整的。
local community — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When discussing wildlife, people should explain why an efficient solution matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ən ɪˈfɪʃənt səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz./
在讨论野生生物时，人们应该解释为什么有效的解决办法很重要。
efficient — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case shows why a sustainable solution matters when people make decisions about wildlife.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ə səˈsteɪnəbəl səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
案件表明，当人们做出有关野生动物的决定时，可持续解决办法为何重要。
sustainable — 保留结构，替换真实细节。One group may benefit, whereas another group may face extra pressure.
/wʌn ɡɹup meɪ ˈbɛnəfɪt, wɛˈɹæz əˈnʌðɚ ɡɹup meɪ feɪs ˈɛkstɹə ˈpɹɛʃɚ./
一组可能会受益，而另一组可能会面临额外的压力。
whereas — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When discussing wildlife, people should explain why an important effect matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ən ɪmˈpɔɹtənt ɪˈfɛkt ˈmætɚz./
在讨论野生动物时，人们应该解释为什么一个重要的影响很重要。
important — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case shows why a possible solution matters when people make decisions about wildlife.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ə ˈpɑsəbəl səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
案件表明，当人们就野生动物作出决定时，可能的解决办法为何重要。
possible — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A concrete example can provide evidence for a claim about wildlife.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən pɹəˈvaɪd ˈɛvədəns fɚ ə kleɪm əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
一个具体的例子可以为有关野生动物的主张提供证据。
evidence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A balanced approach to wildlife compares benefits, costs, and the needs of different groups.
/ə ˈbælənst əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf kəmˈpɛɹz ˈbɛnəfɪts, kɔsts, ænd ðə nidz əv ˈdɪfɹənt ɡɹups./
对野生动物采取平衡的方法会比较不同群体的利益、成本和需求。
a balanced approach — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main benefit of a thoughtful response to wildlife is a result that people can actually observe.
/ðə meɪn ˈbɛnəfɪt əv ə ˈθɔtfəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ɪz ə ɹɪˈzʌlt ðæt ˈpipəl kən ˈækt͡ʃəli əbˈzɚv./
对野生生物做出深思熟虑的反应的主要好处是人们可以实际观察到的结果。
benefit — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The most practical lesson is that wildlife should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
最实际的教训是，野生生物应该通过实际效果而不是有吸引力的口号来判断。
rather than — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Looking at both benefits and risks prevents the discussion from becoming a list of unsupported positive or negative claims.
/ˈlʊkɪŋ æt boʊθ ˈbɛnəfɪts ænd ɹɪsks pɹɪˈvɛnts ðə dɪˈskʌʃən fɹʌm bɪˈkʌmɪŋ ə lɪst əv ʌnsəˈpɔɹtɪd ˈpɑzɪtɪv ɔɹ ˈnɛɡɪtɪv kleɪmz./
同时考虑收益和风险可以防止讨论变成一系列未经证实的正面或负面主张。
Looking at both benefits — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The strongest example is usually specific enough to picture and relevant enough to support the central point.
/ðə ˈstɹɔŋɡɪst ɪɡˈzæmpəl ɪz ˈjuʒəli spɪˈsɪfɪk ɪˈnʌf tə ˈpɪkt͡ʃɚ ænd ˈɹɛlɪvənt ɪˈnʌf tə səˈpɔɹt ðə ˈsɛntɹəl pɔɪnt./
最强的例子通常足够具体，足以描绘和关联，足以支持中心点。
The strongest example is — 保留结构，替换真实细节。If new evidence challenges the first judgement, changing the judgement is a sign of careful thinking rather than failure.
/ɪf nju ˈɛvədəns ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒɪz ðə fɚst ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt, ˈt͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒɪŋ ðə ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt ɪz ə saɪn əv ˈkɛɹfəl ˈθɪŋkɪŋ ˈɹæðɚ ðən ˈfeɪljɚ./
如果新的证据挑战了最初的判断，改变判断是仔细思考的标志，而不是失败的标志。
evidence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
好的决定会把明确目标、事实证据、人的真实经验，以及修正薄弱方案的意愿联系起来。
evidence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
当这些部分保持连贯时，无论日常交流还是 IELTS 回答，这个主题都会更容易展开。
When those parts stay — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A road project added safe crossings where camera data showed animals regularly moving between habitats.
/ə ɹoʊd ˈpɹɑd͡ʒɛkt ˈædɪd seɪf ˈkɹɔsɪŋz wɛɹ ˈkæmɚə ˈdætə ʃoʊd ˈænəməlz ˈɹɛɡjəlɚli ˈmuvɪŋ bɪˈtwin ˈhæbəˌtæts./
At first, this looked like a small decision about wildlife, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
The case raises a broader question: how habitat protection supports biodiversity.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ˈhæbəˌtæt pɹəˈtɛkʃən səˈpɔɹts ˌbaɪoʊdaɪˈvɚsəti./
Admittedly, one response may create benefits; nevertheless, the strongest counterargument still deserves an answer.
/ædˈmɪtɪdli, wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns meɪ kɹiˈeɪt ˈbɛnəfɪts; ˌnɛvɚðəˈlɛs, ðə ˈstɹɔŋɡɪst ˈkaʊntɚˌɑɹɡjəmənt stɪl dɪˈzɚvz ən ˈænsɚ./
People can protect biodiversity when a real situation involving wildlife requires action.
/ˈpipəl kən pɹəˈtɛkt ˌbaɪoʊdaɪˈvɚsəti wɛn ə ɹil ˌsɪt͡ʃuˈeɪʃən ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ɹiˈkwaɪɚz ˈækʃən./
A closer look at endangered species reveals a practical side of wildlife that general opinions often miss.
/ə ˈkloʊsɚ lʊk æt ɪnˈdeɪnd͡ʒɚd ˈspiʃiz ɹɪˈvilz ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl saɪd əv ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ðæt ˈd͡ʒɛnɚəl əˈpɪnjənz ˈɔftən mɪs./
The main challenge is to respond to wildlife without creating a larger problem elsewhere.
/ðə meɪn ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒ ɪz tə ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf wɪˈðaʊt kɹiˈeɪtɪŋ ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˈpɹɑbləm ˈɛlˌswɛɹ./
Strong evidence helps people judge wildlife without relying on a single attractive story.
/stɹɔŋ ˈɛvədəns hɛlps ˈpipəl d͡ʒʌd͡ʒ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈlaɪɪŋ ɔn ə ˈsɪŋɡəl əˈtɹæktɪv ˈstɔɹi./
The results indicate that the effects of wildlife are not identical for every group.
/ðə ɹɪˈzʌlts ˈɪndɪˌkeɪt ðæt ðə ɪˈfɛkts əv ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ɑɹ nɑt aɪˈdɛntɪkəl fɚ ˈɛvɹi ɡɹup./
Several personal and social factors contribute to how people experience wildlife.
/ˈsɛvɚəl ˈpɚsənəl ænd ˈsoʊʃəl ˈfæktɚz kənˈtɹɪbjut tə haʊ ˈpipəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
People need realistic support to maintain a balance between the benefits and costs of wildlife.
/ˈpipəl nid ˌɹiəˈlɪstɪk səˈpɔɹt tə meɪnˈteɪn ə ˈbæləns bɪˈtwin ðə ˈbɛnəfɪts ænd kɔsts əv ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
A serious problem involving wildlife may require attention from both individuals and institutions.
/ə ˈsɪɹiəs ˈpɹɑbləm ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf meɪ ɹɪˈkwaɪɚ əˈtɛnʃən fɹʌm boʊθ ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəlz ænd ˌɪnstɪˈtuʃənz./
Available information can change how people understand and respond to wildlife.
/əˈveɪləbəl ˌɪnfɔɹˈmeɪʃən kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
A particular experience can change how people understand and respond to wildlife.
/ə pɚˈtɪkjəlɚ ɪkˈspɪɹiəns kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
Debates about wildlife become difficult when people treat a partial truth as a complete explanation.
/dɪˈbeɪts əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf bɪˈkʌm ˈdɪfɪkʌlt wɛn ˈpipəl tɹit ə ˈpɑɹʃəl tɹuθ æz ə kəmˈplit ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən./
A stronger position acknowledges a reasonable objection, sets clear limits, and still explains why one conclusion is preferable.
/ə ˈstɹɔŋɡɚ pəˈzɪʃən ækˈnɑlɪd͡ʒɪz ə ˈɹiznəbəl əbˈd͡ʒɛkʃən, sɛts klɪɹ ˈlɪmɪts, ænd stɪl ɪkˈspleɪnz waɪ wʌn kəŋˈkluʒən ɪz ˈpɹɛfɚəbəl./
This balance does not weaken the argument; it makes the judgement more precise, credible, and useful.
/ðɪs ˈbæləns dʌz nɑt ˈwikən ðə ˈɑɹɡjəmənt; ɪt meɪks ðə ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt mɔɹ pɹɪˈsaɪs, ˈkɹɛdɪbəl, ænd ˈjusfəl./
When discussing wildlife, people should explain why an alternative solution matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ən ɔlˈtɚnɪtɪv səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz./
The case shows why an individual experience matters when people make decisions about wildlife.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ən ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
Without considering a local community, an important part of the discussion about wildlife would remain incomplete.
/wɪˈðaʊt kənˈsɪdɚɪŋ ə ˈloʊkəl kəˈmjunɪti, ən ɪmˈpɔɹtənt pɑɹt əv ðə dɪˈskʌʃən əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf wʊd ɹɪˈmeɪn ɪŋkəmˈplit./
When discussing wildlife, people should explain why an efficient solution matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ən ɪˈfɪʃənt səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz./
The case shows why a sustainable solution matters when people make decisions about wildlife.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ə səˈsteɪnəbəl səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
One group may benefit, whereas another group may face extra pressure.
/wʌn ɡɹup meɪ ˈbɛnəfɪt, wɛˈɹæz əˈnʌðɚ ɡɹup meɪ feɪs ˈɛkstɹə ˈpɹɛʃɚ./
When discussing wildlife, people should explain why an important effect matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ən ɪmˈpɔɹtənt ɪˈfɛkt ˈmætɚz./
The case shows why a possible solution matters when people make decisions about wildlife.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ə ˈpɑsəbəl səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
A concrete example can provide evidence for a claim about wildlife.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən pɹəˈvaɪd ˈɛvədəns fɚ ə kleɪm əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
A balanced approach to wildlife compares benefits, costs, and the needs of different groups.
/ə ˈbælənst əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf kəmˈpɛɹz ˈbɛnəfɪts, kɔsts, ænd ðə nidz əv ˈdɪfɹənt ɡɹups./
The main benefit of a thoughtful response to wildlife is a result that people can actually observe.
/ðə meɪn ˈbɛnəfɪt əv ə ˈθɔtfəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ɪz ə ɹɪˈzʌlt ðæt ˈpipəl kən ˈækt͡ʃəli əbˈzɚv./
The most practical lesson is that wildlife should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
Looking at both benefits and risks prevents the discussion from becoming a list of unsupported positive or negative claims.
/ˈlʊkɪŋ æt boʊθ ˈbɛnəfɪts ænd ɹɪsks pɹɪˈvɛnts ðə dɪˈskʌʃən fɹʌm bɪˈkʌmɪŋ ə lɪst əv ʌnsəˈpɔɹtɪd ˈpɑzɪtɪv ɔɹ ˈnɛɡɪtɪv kleɪmz./
The strongest example is usually specific enough to picture and relevant enough to support the central point.
/ðə ˈstɹɔŋɡɪst ɪɡˈzæmpəl ɪz ˈjuʒəli spɪˈsɪfɪk ɪˈnʌf tə ˈpɪkt͡ʃɚ ænd ˈɹɛlɪvənt ɪˈnʌf tə səˈpɔɹt ðə ˈsɛntɹəl pɔɪnt./
If new evidence challenges the first judgement, changing the judgement is a sign of careful thinking rather than failure.
/ɪf nju ˈɛvədəns ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒɪz ðə fɚst ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt, ˈt͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒɪŋ ðə ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt ɪz ə saɪn əv ˈkɛɹfəl ˈθɪŋkɪŋ ˈɹæðɚ ðən ˈfeɪljɚ./
Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
02 · Vocabulary
n./phrase · 生物多样性
a key idea used when discussing wildlife
protect biodiversity
n./phrase · 濒危的
a key idea used when discussing wildlife
endangered species
n./v. · 挑战
a difficult task that tests ability
face a challenge
n. · 证据
facts that support a claim
strong evidence
v. · 表明
to show that something is true
results indicate
v. · 促成；贡献
to help cause or achieve something
contribute to
v. · 维持
to keep something at the same level
maintain a balance
v. · 需要
to need something
require attention
adj. · 可获得的
ready to be used or obtained
widely available
adj. · 特定的
specific rather than general
a particular case
n./adj. · 替代方案
another possible choice
an alternative method
n./adj. · 个人；个体的
one person considered separately
individual needs
n. · 社区
people living or working together
local community
adj. · 高效的
working well without waste
an efficient system
adj. · 可持续的
able to continue without serious harm
sustainable development
conj. · 然而；而
used to compare two different facts
whereas others
adj. · 重要的
having great value or influence
play an important role
adj. · 可能的
able to happen or be done
as soon as possible
v. · 提供
to give something that is needed
provide evidence
n./v. · 方法；处理
a way of dealing with something
a balanced approach
n./v. · 益处
a helpful or positive effect
bring benefits
03 · Chunks
protect biodiversity生物多样性；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。endangered species濒危的；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。face a challenge挑战；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。strong evidence证据；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。results indicate表明；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。contribute to促成；贡献；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。maintain a balance维持；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。require attention需要；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。04 · Grammar
这个结构负责把事实、原因、条件或立场组织成一个边界清楚的复杂句。
结构：main clause + logical relationship + supporting clause
原文证据：Admittedly, one response may create benefits; nevertheless, the strongest counterargument still deserves an answer.
常见错误：先保证两个分句都完整，再追求句式复杂度；不要用连接词拼接残句。
你的替换：保留结构，把主题换成自己的工作、生活或学习经历。
05 · Pronunciation
练法：慢读单词 → 读完整搭配 → 回到原句；每一步只录一遍，听完再修正。
06 · Spiral review
Day 343、Day 341、Day 337、Day 330、Day 314
07 · Speak with AI
你是我的一对一英语口语教练。今天是 Day 344，主题是 wildlife，程度目标是 B2→C1。
先让我用自己的话复述今天的文章；一次只问一个问题，并等待我回答。
如果我卡住，只给 2–4 个关键词或一个句首，不要直接给完整答案。
请引导我使用这些词：biodiversity, endangered, challenge, evidence, indicate, contribute, maintain, require, available, particular, alternative。
我的回答至少包含：一个事实、一个原因、一个具体例子、一个结果或判断。
每轮结束后只纠正最影响理解的 1 个语法问题和 1 个发音问题，然后让我重新回答同一个问题。
最后让我脱稿回答：How is wildlife connected to your real life, and what have you learned from it?
结束时用中文列出：做得好的证据、需要修正的两点、三个可复用句型、明天应复习的内容。08 · Imitation
必须回收
biodiversity, endangered, challenge, evidence, indicate, contribute, maintain, require, available, particular, alternative09 · Three-hour path