今天先读文章。所有语法、词汇、短语和发音都从这篇文章里学，不需要先读一页操作说明。
01 · Anchor passage
Two colleagues solved a disagreement by listening without interrupting and agreeing on one clear boundary.
/tu ˈkɑliɡz sɑlvd ə dɪsəˈɡɹimənt baɪ ˈlɪsnɪŋ wɪˈðaʊt ˌɪntɚˈʌptɪŋ ænd əˈɡɹiɪŋ ɔn wʌn klɪɹ ˈbaʊndɚi./
两位同事在不打断和商定一个明确边界的情况下，通过聆听而解决了分歧。
boundary — 保留结构，替换真实细节。At first, this looked like a small decision about relationships, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
起初，这看起来像是一个关于人际关系的小决定，但其结果很快就变得可见。
result — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case raises a broader question: how listening and boundaries improve relationships.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ˈlɪsnɪŋ ænd ˈbaʊndɚiz ɪmˈpɹuv ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps./
该案提出了一个更广泛的问题：倾听和界限如何改善关系。
The case raises a — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The response was useful because it addressed a real need, but it also created a new cost.
/ðə ɹɪˈspɑns wəz ˈjusfəl bɪˈkʌz ɪt əˈdɹɛst ə ɹil nid, bʌt ɪt ˈɔlsoʊ kɹiˈeɪtɪd ə nju kɔst./
反应很有用，因为它解决了真正的需要，但也创造了新的成本。
because — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The example draws attention to a mutual respect, which can shape how people respond to relationships.
/ðə ɪɡˈzæmpəl dɹɔz əˈtɛnʃən tə ə ˈmjut͡ʃuəl ɹɪˈspɛkt, wɪt͡ʃ kən ʃeɪp haʊ ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps./
这个例子提请注意相互尊重，这种相互尊重可以决定人们如何应对关系。
mutual respect — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People can set a boundary when a real situation involving relationships requires action.
/ˈpipəl kən sɛt ə ˈbaʊndɚi wɛn ə ɹil ˌsɪt͡ʃuˈeɪʃən ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps ɹiˈkwaɪɚz ˈækʃən./
当涉及关系的真实情况需要采取行动时，人们可以设定界限。
set a boundary — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A convincing view of relationships gives a reason and then tests it against a concrete example.
/ə kənˈvɪnsɪŋ vju əv ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps ɡɪvz ə ˈɹizən ænd ðɛn tɛsts ɪt əˈɡɛnst ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl./
对关系的令人信服的看法给出了一个理由，然后用一个具体的例子来检验它。
reason — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The result matters because it shows whether a response to relationships worked in practice.
/ðə ɹɪˈzʌlt ˈmætɚz bɪˈkʌz ɪt ʃoʊz ˈwɛðɚ ə ɹɪˈspɑns tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps wɚkt ɪn ˈpɹæktɪs./
其结果很重要，因为它表明对关系的反应在实践中是否有效。
result — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Personal experience can introduce relationships, but a wider judgement also needs evidence.
/ˈpɚsənəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns kən ˌɪntɹoʊˈdus ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps, bʌt ə ˈwaɪdɚ ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt ˈɔlsoʊ nidz ˈɛvədəns./
个人经历可以引入关系，但更广泛的判断也需要证据。
personal experience — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A sensible choice about relationships compares immediate convenience with longer-term effects.
/ə ˈsɛnsɪbəl t͡ʃɔɪs əˈbaʊt ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps kəmˈpɛɹz ɪˈmidiɪt kənˈvinjəns wɪθ ˈlɔŋɡɚ tɚm ɪˈfɛkts./
关于关系的明智选择是将眼前的便利与长期影响进行比较。
choice — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main advantage of one response to relationships should be clear enough to observe or measure.
/ðə meɪn ædˈvæntɪd͡ʒ əv wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps ʃʊd bi klɪɹ ɪˈnʌf tə əbˈzɚv ɔɹ ˈmɛʒɚ./
对关系的一种反应的主要优势应足够明确，以便观察或衡量。
main advantage — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A clearly defined problem makes it easier to choose an appropriate response to relationships.
/ə ˈklɪɹli dɪˈfaɪnd ˈpɹɑbləm meɪks ɪt ˈiziɚ tə t͡ʃuz ən əˈpɹoʊpɹiɪt ɹɪˈspɑns tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps./
明确定义的问题可以更轻松地选择对关系的适当反应。
problem — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Personal experience is a useful starting point, but evidence about relationships must also include other groups and conditions.
/ˈpɚsənəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ɪz ə ˈjusfəl ˈstɑɹtɪŋ pɔɪnt, bʌt ˈɛvədəns əˈbaʊt ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps mʌst ˈɔlsoʊ ɪŋˈklud ˈʌðɚ ɡɹups ænd kənˈdɪʃənz./
个人经历是一个有用的起点，但有关关系的证据还必须包括其他群体和条件。
personal experience — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A single example can show that a response is possible; it cannot prove that the response will work everywhere.
/ə ˈsɪŋɡəl ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən ʃoʊ ðæt ə ɹɪˈspɑns ɪz ˈpɑsəbəl; ɪt kæˈnɑt pɹuv ðæt ðə ɹɪˈspɑns wɪl wɚk ˈɛvɹiˌwɛɹ./
一个例子就可以表明响应是可能的；它不能证明这种应对措施在任何地方都有效。
possible — 保留结构，替换真实细节。For that reason, responsible decisions define a goal, observe the result, and change direction when the evidence is weak.
/fɚ ðæt ˈɹizən, ɹiˈspɑnsɪbəl dɪˈsɪʒənz dɪˈfaɪn ə ɡoʊl, əbˈzɚv ðə ɹɪˈzʌlt, ænd t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ dɪˈɹɛkʃən wɛn ðə ˈɛvədəns ɪz wik./
因此，负责任的决策会定义目标，观察结果，并在证据薄弱时改变方向。
reason — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A practical solution to relationships should fit local needs and remain realistic over time.
/ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈluʃən tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps ʃʊd fɪt ˈloʊkəl nidz ænd ɹɪˈmeɪn ˌɹiəˈlɪstɪk ˈoʊvɚ taɪm./
切实可行的关系解决方案应该适合当地需求，并随着时间的推移保持现实。
practical solution — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A positive change in relationships becomes credible when people can explain how it happened.
/ə ˈpɑzɪtɪv t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪn ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps bɪˈkʌmz ˈkɹɛdɪbəl wɛn ˈpipəl kən ɪkˈspleɪn haʊ ɪt ˈhæpənd./
当人们能够解释人际关系的积极变化是如何发生的时，这种积极的变化就会变得可信。
positive change — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Practical support can help people respond to relationships without removing individual responsibility.
/ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈpɔɹt kən hɛlp ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈmuvɪŋ ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɹiˌspɑnsɪˈbɪləti./
实际支持可以帮助人们在不消除个人责任的情况下应对人际关系。
support — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Communities can develop a practical response to relationships by testing a small change first.
/kəˈmjunɪtiz kən dɪˈvɛləp ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps baɪ ˈtɛstɪŋ ə smɔl t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ fɚst./
社区可以通过首先测试一个小的改变来对关系做出实际的反应。
change — 保留结构，替换真实细节。This matters because the decision changes what people can do in ordinary life.
/ðɪs ˈmætɚz bɪˈkʌz ðə dɪˈsɪʒən ˈt͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒɪz wʌt ˈpipəl kən du ɪn ˈɔɹdɪˌnɛɹi laɪf./
这很重要，因为决定会改变人们在普通生活中所能做的事情。
because — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Although one response may help, no single solution will suit every person.
/ɔlˈðoʊ wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns meɪ hɛlp, noʊ ˈsɪŋɡəl səˈluʃən wɪl sut ˈɛvɹi ˈpɚsən./
尽管一种回应可能会有所帮助，但没有一种解决方案适合所有人。
solution — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case shows why an important effect matters when people make decisions about relationships.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ən ɪmˈpɔɹtənt ɪˈfɛkt ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps./
案件表明，当人们就关系作出决定时，一个重要的影响为何重要。
important — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A possible solution can change how people understand and respond to relationships.
/ə ˈpɑsəbəl səˈluʃən kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps./
一个可能的解决方案可以改变人们理解和应对人际关系的方式。
solution — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The most practical lesson is that relationships should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
最实际的教训是，应该通过实际效果而不是有吸引力的口号来判断关系。
rather than — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The strongest example is usually specific enough to picture and relevant enough to support the central point.
/ðə ˈstɹɔŋɡɪst ɪɡˈzæmpəl ɪz ˈjuʒəli spɪˈsɪfɪk ɪˈnʌf tə ˈpɪkt͡ʃɚ ænd ˈɹɛlɪvənt ɪˈnʌf tə səˈpɔɹt ðə ˈsɛntɹəl pɔɪnt./
最强的例子通常足够具体，足以描绘和关联，足以支持中心点。
support — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
好的决定会把明确目标、事实证据、人的真实经验，以及修正薄弱方案的意愿联系起来。
experience — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
当这些部分保持连贯时，无论日常交流还是 IELTS 回答，这个主题都会更容易展开。
When those parts stay — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Two colleagues solved a disagreement by listening without interrupting and agreeing on one clear boundary.
/tu ˈkɑliɡz sɑlvd ə dɪsəˈɡɹimənt baɪ ˈlɪsnɪŋ wɪˈðaʊt ˌɪntɚˈʌptɪŋ ænd əˈɡɹiɪŋ ɔn wʌn klɪɹ ˈbaʊndɚi./
At first, this looked like a small decision about relationships, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
The case raises a broader question: how listening and boundaries improve relationships.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ˈlɪsnɪŋ ænd ˈbaʊndɚiz ɪmˈpɹuv ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps./
The response was useful because it addressed a real need, but it also created a new cost.
/ðə ɹɪˈspɑns wəz ˈjusfəl bɪˈkʌz ɪt əˈdɹɛst ə ɹil nid, bʌt ɪt ˈɔlsoʊ kɹiˈeɪtɪd ə nju kɔst./
The example draws attention to a mutual respect, which can shape how people respond to relationships.
/ðə ɪɡˈzæmpəl dɹɔz əˈtɛnʃən tə ə ˈmjut͡ʃuəl ɹɪˈspɛkt, wɪt͡ʃ kən ʃeɪp haʊ ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps./
People can set a boundary when a real situation involving relationships requires action.
/ˈpipəl kən sɛt ə ˈbaʊndɚi wɛn ə ɹil ˌsɪt͡ʃuˈeɪʃən ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps ɹiˈkwaɪɚz ˈækʃən./
A convincing view of relationships gives a reason and then tests it against a concrete example.
/ə kənˈvɪnsɪŋ vju əv ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps ɡɪvz ə ˈɹizən ænd ðɛn tɛsts ɪt əˈɡɛnst ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl./
The result matters because it shows whether a response to relationships worked in practice.
/ðə ɹɪˈzʌlt ˈmætɚz bɪˈkʌz ɪt ʃoʊz ˈwɛðɚ ə ɹɪˈspɑns tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps wɚkt ɪn ˈpɹæktɪs./
Personal experience can introduce relationships, but a wider judgement also needs evidence.
/ˈpɚsənəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns kən ˌɪntɹoʊˈdus ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps, bʌt ə ˈwaɪdɚ ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt ˈɔlsoʊ nidz ˈɛvədəns./
A sensible choice about relationships compares immediate convenience with longer-term effects.
/ə ˈsɛnsɪbəl t͡ʃɔɪs əˈbaʊt ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps kəmˈpɛɹz ɪˈmidiɪt kənˈvinjəns wɪθ ˈlɔŋɡɚ tɚm ɪˈfɛkts./
The main advantage of one response to relationships should be clear enough to observe or measure.
/ðə meɪn ædˈvæntɪd͡ʒ əv wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps ʃʊd bi klɪɹ ɪˈnʌf tə əbˈzɚv ɔɹ ˈmɛʒɚ./
A clearly defined problem makes it easier to choose an appropriate response to relationships.
/ə ˈklɪɹli dɪˈfaɪnd ˈpɹɑbləm meɪks ɪt ˈiziɚ tə t͡ʃuz ən əˈpɹoʊpɹiɪt ɹɪˈspɑns tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps./
Personal experience is a useful starting point, but evidence about relationships must also include other groups and conditions.
/ˈpɚsənəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ɪz ə ˈjusfəl ˈstɑɹtɪŋ pɔɪnt, bʌt ˈɛvədəns əˈbaʊt ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps mʌst ˈɔlsoʊ ɪŋˈklud ˈʌðɚ ɡɹups ænd kənˈdɪʃənz./
A single example can show that a response is possible; it cannot prove that the response will work everywhere.
/ə ˈsɪŋɡəl ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən ʃoʊ ðæt ə ɹɪˈspɑns ɪz ˈpɑsəbəl; ɪt kæˈnɑt pɹuv ðæt ðə ɹɪˈspɑns wɪl wɚk ˈɛvɹiˌwɛɹ./
For that reason, responsible decisions define a goal, observe the result, and change direction when the evidence is weak.
/fɚ ðæt ˈɹizən, ɹiˈspɑnsɪbəl dɪˈsɪʒənz dɪˈfaɪn ə ɡoʊl, əbˈzɚv ðə ɹɪˈzʌlt, ænd t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ dɪˈɹɛkʃən wɛn ðə ˈɛvədəns ɪz wik./
A practical solution to relationships should fit local needs and remain realistic over time.
/ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈluʃən tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps ʃʊd fɪt ˈloʊkəl nidz ænd ɹɪˈmeɪn ˌɹiəˈlɪstɪk ˈoʊvɚ taɪm./
A positive change in relationships becomes credible when people can explain how it happened.
/ə ˈpɑzɪtɪv t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪn ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps bɪˈkʌmz ˈkɹɛdɪbəl wɛn ˈpipəl kən ɪkˈspleɪn haʊ ɪt ˈhæpənd./
Practical support can help people respond to relationships without removing individual responsibility.
/ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈpɔɹt kən hɛlp ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈmuvɪŋ ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɹiˌspɑnsɪˈbɪləti./
Communities can develop a practical response to relationships by testing a small change first.
/kəˈmjunɪtiz kən dɪˈvɛləp ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps baɪ ˈtɛstɪŋ ə smɔl t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ fɚst./
This matters because the decision changes what people can do in ordinary life.
/ðɪs ˈmætɚz bɪˈkʌz ðə dɪˈsɪʒən ˈt͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒɪz wʌt ˈpipəl kən du ɪn ˈɔɹdɪˌnɛɹi laɪf./
Although one response may help, no single solution will suit every person.
/ɔlˈðoʊ wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns meɪ hɛlp, noʊ ˈsɪŋɡəl səˈluʃən wɪl sut ˈɛvɹi ˈpɚsən./
The case shows why an important effect matters when people make decisions about relationships.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ən ɪmˈpɔɹtənt ɪˈfɛkt ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps./
A possible solution can change how people understand and respond to relationships.
/ə ˈpɑsəbəl səˈluʃən kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps./
The most practical lesson is that relationships should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt ɹiˈleɪʃənˌʃɪps ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
The strongest example is usually specific enough to picture and relevant enough to support the central point.
/ðə ˈstɹɔŋɡɪst ɪɡˈzæmpəl ɪz ˈjuʒəli spɪˈsɪfɪk ɪˈnʌf tə ˈpɪkt͡ʃɚ ænd ˈɹɛlɪvənt ɪˈnʌf tə səˈpɔɹt ðə ˈsɛntɹəl pɔɪnt./
Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
02 · Vocabulary
n./phrase · 尊重
a key idea used when discussing relationships
mutual respect
n./phrase · 界限
a key idea used when discussing relationships
set a boundary
n. · 原因
a cause or explanation
give a reason
n. · 结果
something that happens because of an action
as a result
n./v. · 经历；体验
knowledge gained by doing something
personal experience
n. · 选择
an act of choosing between possibilities
make a choice
n. · 优点
a condition that gives a benefit
main advantage
n. · 问题
a situation that needs a solution
solve a problem
n. · 解决办法
a way of solving a problem
practical solution
n./v. · 改变
to become different
positive change
n./v. · 支持
help that makes something possible
support an idea
v. · 发展
to grow or become more advanced
develop a skill
conj. · 因为
for the reason that
because of
conj. · 尽管
despite the fact that
although it is
adj. · 重要的
having great value or influence
play an important role
adj. · 可能的
able to happen or be done
as soon as possible
03 · Chunks
mutual respect尊重；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。set a boundary界限；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。give a reason原因；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。as a result结果；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。personal experience经历；体验；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。make a choice选择；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。main advantage优点；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。solve a problem问题；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。04 · Grammar
连接原因、结果和转折，让短句形成逻辑。
结构：claim + because + reason | cause, so + result
原文证据：The response was useful because it addressed a real need, but it also created a new cost.
常见错误：because 和 so 通常不要在同一句重复使用。
你的替换：保留结构，把主题换成自己的工作、生活或学习经历。
05 · Pronunciation
练法：慢读单词 → 读完整搭配 → 回到原句；每一步只录一遍，听完再修正。
06 · Spiral review
Day 189、Day 187、Day 183、Day 176、Day 160
07 · Speak with AI
你是我的一对一英语口语教练。今天是 Day 190，主题是 relationships，程度目标是 B2。
先让我用自己的话复述今天的文章；一次只问一个问题，并等待我回答。
如果我卡住，只给 2–4 个关键词或一个句首，不要直接给完整答案。
请引导我使用这些词：respect, boundary, reason, result, experience, choice, advantage, problem, solution。
我的回答至少包含：一个事实、一个原因、一个具体例子、一个结果或判断。
每轮结束后只纠正最影响理解的 1 个语法问题和 1 个发音问题，然后让我重新回答同一个问题。
最后让我脱稿回答：How is relationships connected to your real life, and what have you learned from it?
结束时用中文列出：做得好的证据、需要修正的两点、三个可复用句型、明天应复习的内容。08 · Imitation
必须回收
respect, boundary, reason, result, experience, choice, advantage, problem, solution09 · Three-hour path