今天先读文章。所有语法、词汇、短语和发音都从这篇文章里学，不需要先读一页操作说明。
01 · Anchor passage
A road project added safe crossings where camera data showed animals regularly moving between habitats.
/ə ɹoʊd ˈpɹɑd͡ʒɛkt ˈædɪd seɪf ˈkɹɔsɪŋz wɛɹ ˈkæmɚə ˈdætə ʃoʊd ˈænəməlz ˈɹɛɡjəlɚli ˈmuvɪŋ bɪˈtwin ˈhæbəˌtæts./
一个道路项目增加了安全十字路口，摄像头数据显示动物经常在栖息地之间移动。
A road project added — 保留结构，替换真实细节。At first, this looked like a small decision about wildlife, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
起初，这看起来像是一个关于野生动物的小决定，但其结果很快就变得显而易见。
At first — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case raises a broader question: how habitat protection supports biodiversity.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ˈhæbəˌtæt pɹəˈtɛkʃən səˈpɔɹts ˌbaɪoʊdaɪˈvɚsəti./
这一案例提出了一个更广泛的问题：生境保护如何支持生物多样性。
biodiversity — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The first result looked promising; however, the longer-term evidence remained uncertain.
/ðə fɚst ɹɪˈzʌlt lʊkt ˈpɹɑməsɪŋ; ˌhaʊˈɛvɚ, ðə ˈlɔŋɡɚ tɚm ˈɛvədəns ɹɪˈmeɪnd ʌnˈsɚtən./
第一个结果看起来很有希望；但是，长期证据仍然不确定。
The first result looked — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People can protect biodiversity when a real situation involving wildlife requires action.
/ˈpipəl kən pɹəˈtɛkt ˌbaɪoʊdaɪˈvɚsəti wɛn ə ɹil ˌsɪt͡ʃuˈeɪʃən ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ɹiˈkwaɪɚz ˈækʃən./
当涉及野生动物的实际情况需要采取行动时，人们可以保护生物多样性。
protect biodiversity — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A closer look at endangered species reveals a practical side of wildlife that general opinions often miss.
/ə ˈkloʊsɚ lʊk æt ɪnˈdeɪnd͡ʒɚd ˈspiʃiz ɹɪˈvilz ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl saɪd əv ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ðæt ˈd͡ʒɛnɚəl əˈpɪnjənz ˈɔftən mɪs./
仔细观察濒临灭绝的物种，可以发现野生动物的实际一面，而一般观点常常忽视这一面。
endangered species — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case shows why an individual experience matters when people make decisions about wildlife.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ən ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
案件表明，当人们就野生动物作出决定时，个人的经验为何重要。
individual — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People may judge the importance of a local community differently because their needs and resources are not identical.
/ˈpipəl meɪ d͡ʒʌd͡ʒ ðə ɪmˈpɔɹtəns əv ə ˈloʊkəl kəˈmjunɪti ˈdɪfɹəntli bɪˈkʌz ðɛɹ nidz ænd ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ɑɹ nɑt aɪˈdɛntɪkəl./
人们可能会以不同的方式判断当地社区的重要性，因为他们的需求和资源并不相同。
local community — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When discussing wildlife, people should explain why an efficient solution matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ən ɪˈfɪʃənt səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz./
在讨论野生生物时，人们应该解释为什么有效的解决办法很重要。
efficient — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case shows why a sustainable solution matters when people make decisions about wildlife.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ə səˈsteɪnəbəl səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
案件表明，当人们做出有关野生动物的决定时，可持续解决办法为何重要。
sustainable — 保留结构，替换真实细节。One group may benefit, whereas another group may face extra pressure.
/wʌn ɡɹup meɪ ˈbɛnəfɪt, wɛˈɹæz əˈnʌðɚ ɡɹup meɪ feɪs ˈɛkstɹə ˈpɹɛʃɚ./
一组可能会受益，而另一组可能会面临额外的压力。
whereas — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The evidence is incomplete; therefore, the decision should remain open to revision.
/ðə ˈɛvədəns ɪz ɪŋkəmˈplit; ˈðɛɹˌfɔɹ, ðə dɪˈsɪʒən ʃʊd ɹɪˈmeɪn ˈoʊpən tə ɹiˈvɪʒən./
证据不全；因此，该决定仍可修改。
therefore — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People may judge the importance of a from this perspective differently because their needs and resources are not identical.
/ˈpipəl meɪ d͡ʒʌd͡ʒ ðə ɪmˈpɔɹtəns əv ə fɹʌm ðɪs pɚˈspɛktɪv ˈdɪfɹəntli bɪˈkʌz ðɛɹ nidz ænd ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ɑɹ nɑt aɪˈdɛntɪkəl./
人们可能会从这个角度对a的重要性做出不同的判断，因为他们的需求和资源并不相同。
from this perspective — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Personal experience is a useful starting point, but evidence about wildlife must also include other groups and conditions.
/ˈpɚsənəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ɪz ə ˈjusfəl ˈstɑɹtɪŋ pɔɪnt, bʌt ˈɛvədəns əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf mʌst ˈɔlsoʊ ɪŋˈklud ˈʌðɚ ɡɹups ænd kənˈdɪʃənz./
个人经验是一个有用的起点，但有关野生动物的证据还必须包括其他群体和条件。
Personal experience is a — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A single example can show that a response is possible; it cannot prove that the response will work everywhere.
/ə ˈsɪŋɡəl ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən ʃoʊ ðæt ə ɹɪˈspɑns ɪz ˈpɑsəbəl; ɪt kæˈnɑt pɹuv ðæt ðə ɹɪˈspɑns wɪl wɚk ˈɛvɹiˌwɛɹ./
一个例子就可以表明响应是可能的；它不能证明这种应对措施在任何地方都有效。
possible — 保留结构，替换真实细节。For that reason, responsible decisions define a goal, observe the result, and change direction when the evidence is weak.
/fɚ ðæt ˈɹizən, ɹiˈspɑnsɪbəl dɪˈsɪʒənz dɪˈfaɪn ə ɡoʊl, əbˈzɚv ðə ɹɪˈzʌlt, ænd t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ dɪˈɹɛkʃən wɛn ðə ˈɛvədəns ɪz wik./
因此，负责任的决策会定义目标，观察结果，并在证据薄弱时改变方向。
For that reason — 保留结构，替换真实细节。In practice, an upward trend can connect an individual experience of wildlife with a wider consequence.
/ɪn ˈpɹæktɪs, ən ˈʌpwɚd tɹɛnd kən kəˈnɛkt ən ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns əv ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf wɪθ ə ˈwaɪdɚ ˈkɑnsəkwəns./
实际上，上升趋势可以将野生动物的个人经历与更广泛的后果联系起来。
individual — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When discussing wildlife, people should explain why a substantial effect matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ə sʌbˈstænʃəl ɪˈfɛkt ˈmætɚz./
在讨论野生动物时，人们应该解释为什么实质性效果很重要。
substantial — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case shows why a complex issue matters when people make decisions about wildlife.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ə ˈkɑmplɛks ˈɪʃu ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
案件表明，当人们做出有关野生动物的决定时，复杂问题为何重要。
a complex issue — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A crucial factor can change how people understand and respond to wildlife.
/ə ˈkɹuʃəl ˈfæktɚ kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
一个关键因素可以改变人们对野生动物的理解和反应。
crucial — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When discussing wildlife, people should explain why a possible solution matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ə ˈpɑsəbəl səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz./
在讨论野生动物时，人们应该解释一个可能的解决办法为何重要。
possible — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A concrete example can provide evidence for a claim about wildlife.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən pɹəˈvaɪd ˈɛvədəns fɚ ə kleɪm əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
一个具体的例子可以为有关野生动物的主张提供证据。
provide evidence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A balanced approach to wildlife compares benefits, costs, and the needs of different groups.
/ə ˈbælənst əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf kəmˈpɛɹz ˈbɛnəfɪts, kɔsts, ænd ðə nidz əv ˈdɪfɹənt ɡɹups./
对野生动物采取平衡的方法会比较不同群体的利益、成本和需求。
a balanced approach — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main benefit of a thoughtful response to wildlife is a result that people can actually observe.
/ðə meɪn ˈbɛnəfɪt əv ə ˈθɔtfəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ɪz ə ɹɪˈzʌlt ðæt ˈpipəl kən ˈækt͡ʃəli əbˈzɚv./
对野生生物做出深思熟虑的反应的主要好处是人们可以实际观察到的结果。
benefit — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main challenge is to respond to wildlife without creating a larger problem elsewhere.
/ðə meɪn ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒ ɪz tə ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf wɪˈðaʊt kɹiˈeɪtɪŋ ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˈpɹɑbləm ˈɛlˌswɛɹ./
主要的挑战在于应对野生动物而不在别处造成更大的问题。
challenge — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The most practical lesson is that wildlife should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
最实际的教训是，野生生物应该通过实际效果而不是有吸引力的口号来判断。
rather than — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A useful explanation also distinguishes what one person can change from what requires support from a larger institution.
/ə ˈjusfəl ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən ˈɔlsoʊ dɪˈstɪŋɡwɪʃɪz wʌt wʌn ˈpɚsən kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ fɹʌm wʌt ɹiˈkwaɪɚz səˈpɔɹt fɹʌm ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˌɪnstɪˈtuʃən./
一个有用的解释还可以区分一个人可以改变的事情和需要更大机构支持的事情。
A useful explanation also — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
好的决定会把明确目标、事实证据、人的真实经验，以及修正薄弱方案的意愿联系起来。
approach — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
当这些部分保持连贯时，无论日常交流还是 IELTS 回答，这个主题都会更容易展开。
When those parts stay — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A road project added safe crossings where camera data showed animals regularly moving between habitats.
/ə ɹoʊd ˈpɹɑd͡ʒɛkt ˈædɪd seɪf ˈkɹɔsɪŋz wɛɹ ˈkæmɚə ˈdætə ʃoʊd ˈænəməlz ˈɹɛɡjəlɚli ˈmuvɪŋ bɪˈtwin ˈhæbəˌtæts./
At first, this looked like a small decision about wildlife, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
The case raises a broader question: how habitat protection supports biodiversity.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ˈhæbəˌtæt pɹəˈtɛkʃən səˈpɔɹts ˌbaɪoʊdaɪˈvɚsəti./
The first result looked promising; however, the longer-term evidence remained uncertain.
/ðə fɚst ɹɪˈzʌlt lʊkt ˈpɹɑməsɪŋ; ˌhaʊˈɛvɚ, ðə ˈlɔŋɡɚ tɚm ˈɛvədəns ɹɪˈmeɪnd ʌnˈsɚtən./
People can protect biodiversity when a real situation involving wildlife requires action.
/ˈpipəl kən pɹəˈtɛkt ˌbaɪoʊdaɪˈvɚsəti wɛn ə ɹil ˌsɪt͡ʃuˈeɪʃən ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ɹiˈkwaɪɚz ˈækʃən./
A closer look at endangered species reveals a practical side of wildlife that general opinions often miss.
/ə ˈkloʊsɚ lʊk æt ɪnˈdeɪnd͡ʒɚd ˈspiʃiz ɹɪˈvilz ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl saɪd əv ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ðæt ˈd͡ʒɛnɚəl əˈpɪnjənz ˈɔftən mɪs./
The case shows why an individual experience matters when people make decisions about wildlife.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ən ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
People may judge the importance of a local community differently because their needs and resources are not identical.
/ˈpipəl meɪ d͡ʒʌd͡ʒ ðə ɪmˈpɔɹtəns əv ə ˈloʊkəl kəˈmjunɪti ˈdɪfɹəntli bɪˈkʌz ðɛɹ nidz ænd ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ɑɹ nɑt aɪˈdɛntɪkəl./
When discussing wildlife, people should explain why an efficient solution matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ən ɪˈfɪʃənt səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz./
The case shows why a sustainable solution matters when people make decisions about wildlife.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ə səˈsteɪnəbəl səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
One group may benefit, whereas another group may face extra pressure.
/wʌn ɡɹup meɪ ˈbɛnəfɪt, wɛˈɹæz əˈnʌðɚ ɡɹup meɪ feɪs ˈɛkstɹə ˈpɹɛʃɚ./
The evidence is incomplete; therefore, the decision should remain open to revision.
/ðə ˈɛvədəns ɪz ɪŋkəmˈplit; ˈðɛɹˌfɔɹ, ðə dɪˈsɪʒən ʃʊd ɹɪˈmeɪn ˈoʊpən tə ɹiˈvɪʒən./
People may judge the importance of a from this perspective differently because their needs and resources are not identical.
/ˈpipəl meɪ d͡ʒʌd͡ʒ ðə ɪmˈpɔɹtəns əv ə fɹʌm ðɪs pɚˈspɛktɪv ˈdɪfɹəntli bɪˈkʌz ðɛɹ nidz ænd ˈɹisɔɹsɪz ɑɹ nɑt aɪˈdɛntɪkəl./
Personal experience is a useful starting point, but evidence about wildlife must also include other groups and conditions.
/ˈpɚsənəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns ɪz ə ˈjusfəl ˈstɑɹtɪŋ pɔɪnt, bʌt ˈɛvədəns əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf mʌst ˈɔlsoʊ ɪŋˈklud ˈʌðɚ ɡɹups ænd kənˈdɪʃənz./
A single example can show that a response is possible; it cannot prove that the response will work everywhere.
/ə ˈsɪŋɡəl ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən ʃoʊ ðæt ə ɹɪˈspɑns ɪz ˈpɑsəbəl; ɪt kæˈnɑt pɹuv ðæt ðə ɹɪˈspɑns wɪl wɚk ˈɛvɹiˌwɛɹ./
For that reason, responsible decisions define a goal, observe the result, and change direction when the evidence is weak.
/fɚ ðæt ˈɹizən, ɹiˈspɑnsɪbəl dɪˈsɪʒənz dɪˈfaɪn ə ɡoʊl, əbˈzɚv ðə ɹɪˈzʌlt, ænd t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ dɪˈɹɛkʃən wɛn ðə ˈɛvədəns ɪz wik./
In practice, an upward trend can connect an individual experience of wildlife with a wider consequence.
/ɪn ˈpɹæktɪs, ən ˈʌpwɚd tɹɛnd kən kəˈnɛkt ən ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns əv ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf wɪθ ə ˈwaɪdɚ ˈkɑnsəkwəns./
When discussing wildlife, people should explain why a substantial effect matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ə sʌbˈstænʃəl ɪˈfɛkt ˈmætɚz./
The case shows why a complex issue matters when people make decisions about wildlife.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ə ˈkɑmplɛks ˈɪʃu ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
A crucial factor can change how people understand and respond to wildlife.
/ə ˈkɹuʃəl ˈfæktɚ kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
When discussing wildlife, people should explain why a possible solution matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ə ˈpɑsəbəl səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz./
A concrete example can provide evidence for a claim about wildlife.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən pɹəˈvaɪd ˈɛvədəns fɚ ə kleɪm əˈbaʊt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf./
A balanced approach to wildlife compares benefits, costs, and the needs of different groups.
/ə ˈbælənst əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf kəmˈpɛɹz ˈbɛnəfɪts, kɔsts, ænd ðə nidz əv ˈdɪfɹənt ɡɹups./
The main benefit of a thoughtful response to wildlife is a result that people can actually observe.
/ðə meɪn ˈbɛnəfɪt əv ə ˈθɔtfəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ɪz ə ɹɪˈzʌlt ðæt ˈpipəl kən ˈækt͡ʃəli əbˈzɚv./
The main challenge is to respond to wildlife without creating a larger problem elsewhere.
/ðə meɪn ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒ ɪz tə ɹɪˈspɑnd tə ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf wɪˈðaʊt kɹiˈeɪtɪŋ ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˈpɹɑbləm ˈɛlˌswɛɹ./
The most practical lesson is that wildlife should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt ˈwaɪldˌlaɪf ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
A useful explanation also distinguishes what one person can change from what requires support from a larger institution.
/ə ˈjusfəl ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən ˈɔlsoʊ dɪˈstɪŋɡwɪʃɪz wʌt wʌn ˈpɚsən kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ fɹʌm wʌt ɹiˈkwaɪɚz səˈpɔɹt fɹʌm ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˌɪnstɪˈtuʃən./
Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
02 · Vocabulary
n./phrase · 生物多样性
a key idea used when discussing wildlife
protect biodiversity
n./phrase · 濒危的
a key idea used when discussing wildlife
endangered species
n./adj. · 个人；个体的
one person considered separately
individual needs
n. · 社区
people living or working together
local community
adj. · 高效的
working well without waste
an efficient system
adj. · 可持续的
able to continue without serious harm
sustainable development
conj. · 然而；而
used to compare two different facts
whereas others
adv. · 因此
for that reason
therefore, governments
n. · 视角
a particular way of viewing something
from this perspective
n. · 趋势
a general direction of change
an upward trend
adj. · 大量的；实质的
large in amount or importance
a substantial difference
adj. · 复杂的
made of connected parts and difficult to understand
a complex issue
adj. · 关键的
extremely important
a crucial role
adj. · 可能的
able to happen or be done
as soon as possible
v. · 提供
to give something that is needed
provide evidence
n./v. · 方法；处理
a way of dealing with something
a balanced approach
n./v. · 益处
a helpful or positive effect
bring benefits
n./v. · 挑战
a difficult task that tests ability
face a challenge
03 · Chunks
protect biodiversity生物多样性；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。endangered species濒危的；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。individual needs个人；个体的；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。local community社区；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。an efficient system高效的；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。sustainable development可持续的；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。whereas others然而；而；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。therefore, governments因此；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。04 · Grammar
这个结构负责把事实、原因、条件或立场组织成一个边界清楚的复杂句。
结构：main clause + logical relationship + supporting clause
原文证据：The first result looked promising; however, the longer-term evidence remained uncertain.
常见错误：先保证两个分句都完整，再追求句式复杂度；不要用连接词拼接残句。
你的替换：保留结构，把主题换成自己的工作、生活或学习经历。
05 · Pronunciation
练法：慢读单词 → 读完整搭配 → 回到原句；每一步只录一遍，听完再修正。
06 · Spiral review
Day 250、Day 248、Day 244、Day 237、Day 221
07 · Speak with AI
你是我的一对一英语口语教练。今天是 Day 251，主题是 wildlife，程度目标是 B2。
先让我用自己的话复述今天的文章；一次只问一个问题，并等待我回答。
如果我卡住，只给 2–4 个关键词或一个句首，不要直接给完整答案。
请引导我使用这些词：biodiversity, endangered, individual, community, efficient, sustainable, whereas, therefore, perspective, trend。
我的回答至少包含：一个事实、一个原因、一个具体例子、一个结果或判断。
每轮结束后只纠正最影响理解的 1 个语法问题和 1 个发音问题，然后让我重新回答同一个问题。
最后让我脱稿回答：How is wildlife connected to your real life, and what have you learned from it?
结束时用中文列出：做得好的证据、需要修正的两点、三个可复用句型、明天应复习的内容。08 · Imitation
必须回收
biodiversity, endangered, individual, community, efficient, sustainable, whereas, therefore, perspective, trend09 · Three-hour path