今天先读文章。所有语法、词汇、短语和发音都从这篇文章里学，不需要先读一页操作说明。
01 · Anchor passage
A tenant used a free legal clinic to understand a contract before challenging an unfair charge.
/ə ˈtɛnənt just ə fɹi ˈliɡəl ˈklɪnɪk tə ˌʌndɚˈstænd ə ˈkɑnˌtɹækt bɪˈfɔɹ ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒɪŋ ən ʌnˈfɛɹ t͡ʃɑɹd͡ʒ./
一名租户在对不公平收费提出质疑之前，曾使用免费法律诊所来了解合同。
legal — 保留结构，替换真实细节。At first, this looked like a small decision about law, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt lɔ, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
起初，这看起来像是一个关于法律的小决定，但其结果很快就变得可见。
result — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case raises a broader question: how rules protect rights and define responsibilities.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ɹulz pɹəˈtɛkt ɹaɪts ænd dɪˈfaɪn ɹiˌspɑnsɪˈbɪlətiz./
该案提出了一个更广泛的问题：规则如何保护权利和界定责任。
The case raises a — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Although the sentence contains two clauses, each clause remains complete and accurately connected.
/ɔlˈðoʊ ðə ˈsɛntəns kənˈteɪnz tu ˈklɔzɪz, it͡ʃ klɔz ɹɪˈmeɪnz kəmˈplit ænd ˈækjɚɪtli kəˈnɛktɪd./
尽管该句子包含两个分句，但每个分句仍然完整且准确连接。
although — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The example draws attention to a legal system, which can shape how people respond to law.
/ðə ɪɡˈzæmpəl dɹɔz əˈtɛnʃən tə ə ˈliɡəl ˈsɪstəm, wɪt͡ʃ kən ʃeɪp haʊ ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə lɔ./
这个例子提请注意一个法律制度，它可以决定人们如何对法律作出反应。
legal system — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A closer look at access to justice reveals a practical side of law that general opinions often miss.
/ə ˈkloʊsɚ lʊk æt ˈækˌsɛs tə ˈd͡ʒʌstɪs ɹɪˈvilz ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl saɪd əv lɔ ðæt ˈd͡ʒɛnɚəl əˈpɪnjənz ˈɔftən mɪs./
仔细审视诉诸司法的机会，可以发现一般观点常常忽视的法律实用方面。
access to justice — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The meaning of law becomes clearer when people connect it to a real experience.
/ðə ˈminɪŋ əv lɔ bɪˈkʌmz ˈklɪɹɚ wɛn ˈpipəl kəˈnɛkt ɪt tə ə ɹil ɪkˈspɪɹiəns./
当人们将法律与真实经验联系起来时，法律的意义就变得更加明确。
meaning — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People can describe an experience when a real situation involving law requires action.
/ˈpipəl kən dɪˈskɹaɪb ən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns wɛn ə ɹil ˌsɪt͡ʃuˈeɪʃən ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ lɔ ɹiˈkwaɪɚz ˈækʃən./
当涉及法律的真实情况需要采取行动时，人们可以描述一种经历。
describe an experience — 保留结构，替换真实细节。People can compare two responses to law only when they use the same criteria.
/ˈpipəl kən kəmˈpɛɹ tu ɹɪˈspɑnsɪz tə lɔ ˈoʊnli wɛn ðeɪ juz ðə seɪm kɹaɪˈtɪɹiə./
人们只有使用相同的标准才能比较两种对法律的反应。
compare — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A convincing view of law gives a reason and then tests it against a concrete example.
/ə kənˈvɪnsɪŋ vju əv lɔ ɡɪvz ə ˈɹizən ænd ðɛn tɛsts ɪt əˈɡɛnst ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl./
令人信服的法律观给出了一个理由，然后用一个具体的例子来检验它。
reason — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The result matters because it shows whether a response to law worked in practice.
/ðə ɹɪˈzʌlt ˈmætɚz bɪˈkʌz ɪt ʃoʊz ˈwɛðɚ ə ɹɪˈspɑns tə lɔ wɚkt ɪn ˈpɹæktɪs./
结果很重要，因为它表明对法律的反应在实践中是否有效。
result — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Personal experience can introduce law, but a wider judgement also needs evidence.
/ˈpɚsənəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns kən ˌɪntɹoʊˈdus lɔ, bʌt ə ˈwaɪdɚ ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt ˈɔlsoʊ nidz ˈɛvədəns./
个人经验可以引入法律，但更广泛的判断也需要证据。
personal experience — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A sensible choice about law compares immediate convenience with longer-term effects.
/ə ˈsɛnsɪbəl t͡ʃɔɪs əˈbaʊt lɔ kəmˈpɛɹz ɪˈmidiɪt kənˈvinjəns wɪθ ˈlɔŋɡɚ tɚm ɪˈfɛkts./
对法律的明智选择是将眼前的便利与长期影响进行比较。
choice — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main advantage of one response to law should be clear enough to observe or measure.
/ðə meɪn ædˈvæntɪd͡ʒ əv wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns tə lɔ ʃʊd bi klɪɹ ɪˈnʌf tə əbˈzɚv ɔɹ ˈmɛʒɚ./
对法律的一种反应的主要好处应当足够明确，以便遵守或衡量。
main advantage — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Debates about law become difficult when people treat a partial truth as a complete explanation.
/dɪˈbeɪts əˈbaʊt lɔ bɪˈkʌm ˈdɪfɪkʌlt wɛn ˈpipəl tɹit ə ˈpɑɹʃəl tɹuθ æz ə kəmˈplit ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən./
当人们将部分事实视为完整的解释时，有关法律的辩论就会变得困难。
Debates about law become — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A stronger position acknowledges a reasonable objection, sets clear limits, and still explains why one conclusion is preferable.
/ə ˈstɹɔŋɡɚ pəˈzɪʃən ækˈnɑlɪd͡ʒɪz ə ˈɹiznəbəl əbˈd͡ʒɛkʃən, sɛts klɪɹ ˈlɪmɪts, ænd stɪl ɪkˈspleɪnz waɪ wʌn kəŋˈkluʒən ɪz ˈpɹɛfɚəbəl./
更强硬的立场承认合理的反对意见，设定明确的限制，并仍然解释为什么一个结论更可取。
A stronger position acknowledges — 保留结构，替换真实细节。This balance does not weaken the argument; it makes the judgement more precise, credible, and useful.
/ðɪs ˈbæləns dʌz nɑt ˈwikən ðə ˈɑɹɡjəmənt; ɪt meɪks ðə ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt mɔɹ pɹɪˈsaɪs, ˈkɹɛdɪbəl, ænd ˈjusfəl./
这种平衡并不削弱这一论点；它使判断更加准确、可信和有用。
This balance does not — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A clearly defined problem makes it easier to choose an appropriate response to law.
/ə ˈklɪɹli dɪˈfaɪnd ˈpɹɑbləm meɪks ɪt ˈiziɚ tə t͡ʃuz ən əˈpɹoʊpɹiɪt ɹɪˈspɑns tə lɔ./
明确定义的问题可以更容易地选择适当的法律回应。
problem — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A practical solution to law should fit local needs and remain realistic over time.
/ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈluʃən tə lɔ ʃʊd fɪt ˈloʊkəl nidz ænd ɹɪˈmeɪn ˌɹiəˈlɪstɪk ˈoʊvɚ taɪm./
切实可行的法律解决方案应适合当地需求，并随着时间的推移保持现实。
practical solution — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A positive change in law becomes credible when people can explain how it happened.
/ə ˈpɑzɪtɪv t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪn lɔ bɪˈkʌmz ˈkɹɛdɪbəl wɛn ˈpipəl kən ɪkˈspleɪn haʊ ɪt ˈhæpənd./
当人们能够解释法律的积极变化是如何发生的时，法律的积极变化就会变得可信。
positive change — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Practical support can help people respond to law without removing individual responsibility.
/ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈpɔɹt kən hɛlp ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə lɔ wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈmuvɪŋ ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɹiˌspɑnsɪˈbɪləti./
实际支持可以帮助人们在不免除个人责任的情况下回应法律。
support — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Communities can develop a practical response to law by testing a small change first.
/kəˈmjunɪtiz kən dɪˈvɛləp ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə lɔ baɪ ˈtɛstɪŋ ə smɔl t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ fɚst./
社区可以通过首先测试一个小的改变来制定对法律的实际反应。
change — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The effect of law may vary according to a person's needs, resources, and circumstances.
/ðə ɪˈfɛkt əv lɔ meɪ ˈvɛɹi əˈkɔɹdɪŋ tə ə ˈpɚsənz nidz, ˈɹisɔɹsɪz, ænd ˈsɚkəmˌstænsɪz./
法律的效果可能因个人的需求、资源和情况而异。
effect — 保留结构，替换真实细节。This matters because the decision changes what people can do in ordinary life.
/ðɪs ˈmætɚz bɪˈkʌz ðə dɪˈsɪʒən ˈt͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒɪz wʌt ˈpipəl kən du ɪn ˈɔɹdɪˌnɛɹi laɪf./
这很重要，因为决定会改变人们在普通生活中所能做的事情。
because — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Although one response may help, no single solution will suit every person.
/ɔlˈðoʊ wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns meɪ hɛlp, noʊ ˈsɪŋɡəl səˈluʃən wɪl sut ˈɛvɹi ˈpɚsən./
尽管一种回应可能会有所帮助，但没有一种解决方案适合所有人。
solution — 保留结构，替换真实细节。An important effect can change how people understand and respond to law.
/ən ɪmˈpɔɹtənt ɪˈfɛkt kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə lɔ./
一个重要的影响可以改变人们对法律的理解和反应。
change — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When discussing law, people should explain why a possible solution matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ lɔ, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ə ˈpɑsəbəl səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz./
在讨论法律时，人们应该解释一个可能的解决办法为何重要。
solution — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A concrete example can provide evidence for a claim about law.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən pɹəˈvaɪd ˈɛvədəns fɚ ə kleɪm əˈbaʊt lɔ./
一个具体的例子可以为有关法律的主张提供证据。
provide evidence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The most practical lesson is that law should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt lɔ ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
最实际的教训是，应当通过实际效果而不是有吸引力的口号来判断法律。
rather than — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The people most affected should be heard before a convenient solution is presented as a universal answer.
/ðə ˈpipəl moʊst əˈfɛktɪd ʃʊd bi hɚd bɪˈfɔɹ ə kənˈvinjənt səˈluʃən ɪz pɹɪˈzɛntɪd æz ə ˌjunəˈvɚsəl ˈænsɚ./
在提出一个方便的解决办法作为普遍答案之前，应听取受影响最大的人民的意见。
solution — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Short-term measurements reveal immediate movement, while repeated observations show whether the change is likely to last.
/ʃɔɹt tɚm ˈmɛʒɚmənts ɹɪˈvil ɪˈmidiɪt ˈmuvmənt, waɪl ɹɪˈpitɪd ˌɑbzɚˈveɪʃənz ʃoʊ ˈwɛðɚ ðə t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪz ˈlaɪkli tə læst./
短期测量揭示了即时的变化，而重复观察则表明变化是否可能持续。
change — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
好的决定会把明确目标、事实证据、人的真实经验，以及修正薄弱方案的意愿联系起来。
experience — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
当这些部分保持连贯时，无论日常交流还是 IELTS 回答，这个主题都会更容易展开。
When those parts stay — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A tenant used a free legal clinic to understand a contract before challenging an unfair charge.
/ə ˈtɛnənt just ə fɹi ˈliɡəl ˈklɪnɪk tə ˌʌndɚˈstænd ə ˈkɑnˌtɹækt bɪˈfɔɹ ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒɪŋ ən ʌnˈfɛɹ t͡ʃɑɹd͡ʒ./
At first, this looked like a small decision about law, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt lɔ, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
The case raises a broader question: how rules protect rights and define responsibilities.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ ɹulz pɹəˈtɛkt ɹaɪts ænd dɪˈfaɪn ɹiˌspɑnsɪˈbɪlətiz./
Although the sentence contains two clauses, each clause remains complete and accurately connected.
/ɔlˈðoʊ ðə ˈsɛntəns kənˈteɪnz tu ˈklɔzɪz, it͡ʃ klɔz ɹɪˈmeɪnz kəmˈplit ænd ˈækjɚɪtli kəˈnɛktɪd./
The example draws attention to a legal system, which can shape how people respond to law.
/ðə ɪɡˈzæmpəl dɹɔz əˈtɛnʃən tə ə ˈliɡəl ˈsɪstəm, wɪt͡ʃ kən ʃeɪp haʊ ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə lɔ./
A closer look at access to justice reveals a practical side of law that general opinions often miss.
/ə ˈkloʊsɚ lʊk æt ˈækˌsɛs tə ˈd͡ʒʌstɪs ɹɪˈvilz ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl saɪd əv lɔ ðæt ˈd͡ʒɛnɚəl əˈpɪnjənz ˈɔftən mɪs./
The meaning of law becomes clearer when people connect it to a real experience.
/ðə ˈminɪŋ əv lɔ bɪˈkʌmz ˈklɪɹɚ wɛn ˈpipəl kəˈnɛkt ɪt tə ə ɹil ɪkˈspɪɹiəns./
People can describe an experience when a real situation involving law requires action.
/ˈpipəl kən dɪˈskɹaɪb ən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns wɛn ə ɹil ˌsɪt͡ʃuˈeɪʃən ɪnˈvɑlvɪŋ lɔ ɹiˈkwaɪɚz ˈækʃən./
People can compare two responses to law only when they use the same criteria.
/ˈpipəl kən kəmˈpɛɹ tu ɹɪˈspɑnsɪz tə lɔ ˈoʊnli wɛn ðeɪ juz ðə seɪm kɹaɪˈtɪɹiə./
A convincing view of law gives a reason and then tests it against a concrete example.
/ə kənˈvɪnsɪŋ vju əv lɔ ɡɪvz ə ˈɹizən ænd ðɛn tɛsts ɪt əˈɡɛnst ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl./
The result matters because it shows whether a response to law worked in practice.
/ðə ɹɪˈzʌlt ˈmætɚz bɪˈkʌz ɪt ʃoʊz ˈwɛðɚ ə ɹɪˈspɑns tə lɔ wɚkt ɪn ˈpɹæktɪs./
Personal experience can introduce law, but a wider judgement also needs evidence.
/ˈpɚsənəl ɪkˈspɪɹiəns kən ˌɪntɹoʊˈdus lɔ, bʌt ə ˈwaɪdɚ ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt ˈɔlsoʊ nidz ˈɛvədəns./
A sensible choice about law compares immediate convenience with longer-term effects.
/ə ˈsɛnsɪbəl t͡ʃɔɪs əˈbaʊt lɔ kəmˈpɛɹz ɪˈmidiɪt kənˈvinjəns wɪθ ˈlɔŋɡɚ tɚm ɪˈfɛkts./
The main advantage of one response to law should be clear enough to observe or measure.
/ðə meɪn ædˈvæntɪd͡ʒ əv wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns tə lɔ ʃʊd bi klɪɹ ɪˈnʌf tə əbˈzɚv ɔɹ ˈmɛʒɚ./
Debates about law become difficult when people treat a partial truth as a complete explanation.
/dɪˈbeɪts əˈbaʊt lɔ bɪˈkʌm ˈdɪfɪkʌlt wɛn ˈpipəl tɹit ə ˈpɑɹʃəl tɹuθ æz ə kəmˈplit ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən./
A stronger position acknowledges a reasonable objection, sets clear limits, and still explains why one conclusion is preferable.
/ə ˈstɹɔŋɡɚ pəˈzɪʃən ækˈnɑlɪd͡ʒɪz ə ˈɹiznəbəl əbˈd͡ʒɛkʃən, sɛts klɪɹ ˈlɪmɪts, ænd stɪl ɪkˈspleɪnz waɪ wʌn kəŋˈkluʒən ɪz ˈpɹɛfɚəbəl./
This balance does not weaken the argument; it makes the judgement more precise, credible, and useful.
/ðɪs ˈbæləns dʌz nɑt ˈwikən ðə ˈɑɹɡjəmənt; ɪt meɪks ðə ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt mɔɹ pɹɪˈsaɪs, ˈkɹɛdɪbəl, ænd ˈjusfəl./
A clearly defined problem makes it easier to choose an appropriate response to law.
/ə ˈklɪɹli dɪˈfaɪnd ˈpɹɑbləm meɪks ɪt ˈiziɚ tə t͡ʃuz ən əˈpɹoʊpɹiɪt ɹɪˈspɑns tə lɔ./
A practical solution to law should fit local needs and remain realistic over time.
/ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈluʃən tə lɔ ʃʊd fɪt ˈloʊkəl nidz ænd ɹɪˈmeɪn ˌɹiəˈlɪstɪk ˈoʊvɚ taɪm./
A positive change in law becomes credible when people can explain how it happened.
/ə ˈpɑzɪtɪv t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪn lɔ bɪˈkʌmz ˈkɹɛdɪbəl wɛn ˈpipəl kən ɪkˈspleɪn haʊ ɪt ˈhæpənd./
Practical support can help people respond to law without removing individual responsibility.
/ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈpɔɹt kən hɛlp ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə lɔ wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈmuvɪŋ ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɹiˌspɑnsɪˈbɪləti./
Communities can develop a practical response to law by testing a small change first.
/kəˈmjunɪtiz kən dɪˈvɛləp ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə lɔ baɪ ˈtɛstɪŋ ə smɔl t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ fɚst./
The effect of law may vary according to a person's needs, resources, and circumstances.
/ðə ɪˈfɛkt əv lɔ meɪ ˈvɛɹi əˈkɔɹdɪŋ tə ə ˈpɚsənz nidz, ˈɹisɔɹsɪz, ænd ˈsɚkəmˌstænsɪz./
This matters because the decision changes what people can do in ordinary life.
/ðɪs ˈmætɚz bɪˈkʌz ðə dɪˈsɪʒən ˈt͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒɪz wʌt ˈpipəl kən du ɪn ˈɔɹdɪˌnɛɹi laɪf./
Although one response may help, no single solution will suit every person.
/ɔlˈðoʊ wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns meɪ hɛlp, noʊ ˈsɪŋɡəl səˈluʃən wɪl sut ˈɛvɹi ˈpɚsən./
An important effect can change how people understand and respond to law.
/ən ɪmˈpɔɹtənt ɪˈfɛkt kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə lɔ./
When discussing law, people should explain why a possible solution matters.
/wɛn dɪˈskʌsɪŋ lɔ, ˈpipəl ʃʊd ɪkˈspleɪn waɪ ə ˈpɑsəbəl səˈluʃən ˈmætɚz./
A concrete example can provide evidence for a claim about law.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən pɹəˈvaɪd ˈɛvədəns fɚ ə kleɪm əˈbaʊt lɔ./
The most practical lesson is that law should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt lɔ ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
The people most affected should be heard before a convenient solution is presented as a universal answer.
/ðə ˈpipəl moʊst əˈfɛktɪd ʃʊd bi hɚd bɪˈfɔɹ ə kənˈvinjənt səˈluʃən ɪz pɹɪˈzɛntɪd æz ə ˌjunəˈvɚsəl ˈænsɚ./
Short-term measurements reveal immediate movement, while repeated observations show whether the change is likely to last.
/ʃɔɹt tɚm ˈmɛʒɚmənts ɹɪˈvil ɪˈmidiɪt ˈmuvmənt, waɪl ɹɪˈpitɪd ˌɑbzɚˈveɪʃənz ʃoʊ ˈwɛðɚ ðə t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪz ˈlaɪkli tə læst./
Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
02 · Vocabulary
n./phrase · 法律的
a key idea used when discussing law
legal system
n./phrase · 正义
a key idea used when discussing law
access to justice
n. · 意思
the idea expressed by a word
guess the meaning
v. · 描述
to say what someone or something is like
describe an experience
v. · 比较
to examine how things are similar or different
compare two options
n. · 原因
a cause or explanation
give a reason
n. · 结果
something that happens because of an action
as a result
n./v. · 经历；体验
knowledge gained by doing something
personal experience
n. · 选择
an act of choosing between possibilities
make a choice
n. · 优点
a condition that gives a benefit
main advantage
n. · 问题
a situation that needs a solution
solve a problem
n. · 解决办法
a way of solving a problem
practical solution
n./v. · 改变
to become different
positive change
n./v. · 支持
help that makes something possible
support an idea
v. · 发展
to grow or become more advanced
develop a skill
n. · 影响；结果
a change caused by something
have an effect on
conj. · 因为
for the reason that
because of
conj. · 尽管
despite the fact that
although it is
adj. · 重要的
having great value or influence
play an important role
adj. · 可能的
able to happen or be done
as soon as possible
v. · 提供
to give something that is needed
provide evidence
03 · Chunks
legal system法律的；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。access to justice正义；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。guess the meaning意思；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。describe an experience描述；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。compare two options比较；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。give a reason原因；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。as a result结果；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。personal experience经历；体验；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。04 · Grammar
这个结构负责把事实、原因、条件或立场组织成一个边界清楚的复杂句。
结构：main clause + logical relationship + supporting clause
原文证据：Although the sentence contains two clauses, each clause remains complete and accurately connected.
常见错误：先保证两个分句都完整，再追求句式复杂度；不要用连接词拼接残句。
你的替换：保留结构，把主题换成自己的工作、生活或学习经历。
05 · Pronunciation
练法：慢读单词 → 读完整搭配 → 回到原句；每一步只录一遍，听完再修正。
06 · Spiral review
Day 349、Day 347、Day 343、Day 336、Day 320
07 · Speak with AI
你是我的一对一英语口语教练。今天是 Day 350，主题是 law，程度目标是 B2→C1。
先让我用自己的话复述今天的文章；一次只问一个问题，并等待我回答。
如果我卡住，只给 2–4 个关键词或一个句首，不要直接给完整答案。
请引导我使用这些词：legal, justice, meaning, describe, compare, reason, result, experience, choice, advantage, problem。
我的回答至少包含：一个事实、一个原因、一个具体例子、一个结果或判断。
每轮结束后只纠正最影响理解的 1 个语法问题和 1 个发音问题，然后让我重新回答同一个问题。
最后让我脱稿回答：How is law connected to your real life, and what have you learned from it?
结束时用中文列出：做得好的证据、需要修正的两点、三个可复用句型、明天应复习的内容。08 · Imitation
必须回收
legal, justice, meaning, describe, compare, reason, result, experience, choice, advantage, problem09 · Three-hour path