今天先读文章。所有语法、词汇、短语和发音都从这篇文章里学，不需要先读一页操作说明。
01 · Anchor passage
A youth programme combined mentoring, training, and family support in an area with repeated offending.
/ə juθ ˈpɹoʊˌɡɹæm kəmˈbaɪnd ˈmɛntɔɹɪŋ, ˈtɹeɪnɪŋ, ænd ˈfæmɪli səˈpɔɹt ɪn ən ˈɛɹiə wɪθ ɹɪˈpitɪd əˈfɛndɪŋ./
在屡屡犯罪的地区，一项青少年计划结合了指导、培训和家庭支持。
support — 保留结构，替换真实细节。At first, this looked like a small decision about crime, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt kɹaɪm, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
起初，这看起来像是一个关于犯罪的小决定，但其结果很快就变得显而易见。
At first — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case raises a broader question: how prevention, enforcement, and rehabilitation affect safety.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ pɹiˈvɛnʃən, ɪnˈfɔɹsmənt, ænd ˌɹihəˌbɪlɪˈteɪʃən əˈfɛkt ˈseɪfti./
该案提出了一个更广泛的问题：预防、执法和康复如何影响安全。
rehabilitation — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The response combines a short claim, a developed explanation, and a carefully limited conclusion.
/ðə ɹɪˈspɑns kəmˈbaɪnz ə ʃɔɹt kleɪm, ə dɪˈvɛləpt ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən, ænd ə ˈkɛɹfəli ˈlɪmɪtɪd kəŋˈkluʒən./
答复综合了一个简短的主张、一个成熟的解释和一个谨慎有限的结论。
The response combines a — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The example draws attention to a criminal offence, which can shape how people respond to crime.
/ðə ɪɡˈzæmpəl dɹɔz əˈtɛnʃən tə ə ˈkɹɪmənəl əˈfɛns, wɪt͡ʃ kən ʃeɪp haʊ ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə kɹaɪm./
这个例子提请注意刑事犯罪，它可以决定人们如何应对犯罪。
criminal offence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A closer look at a prisoner rehabilitation reveals a practical side of crime that general opinions often miss.
/ə ˈkloʊsɚ lʊk æt ə ˈpɹɪznɚ ˌɹihəˌbɪlɪˈteɪʃən ɹɪˈvilz ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl saɪd əv kɹaɪm ðæt ˈd͡ʒɛnɚəl əˈpɪnjənz ˈɔftən mɪs./
仔细观察囚犯改造，可以发现一般观点常常忽略的犯罪的实际一面。
prisoner rehabilitation — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main advantage of one response to crime should be clear enough to observe or measure.
/ðə meɪn ædˈvæntɪd͡ʒ əv wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns tə kɹaɪm ʃʊd bi klɪɹ ɪˈnʌf tə əbˈzɚv ɔɹ ˈmɛʒɚ./
对犯罪采取一项对策的主要好处应足够明确，以观察或衡量。
main advantage — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A clearly defined problem makes it easier to choose an appropriate response to crime.
/ə ˈklɪɹli dɪˈfaɪnd ˈpɹɑbləm meɪks ɪt ˈiziɚ tə t͡ʃuz ən əˈpɹoʊpɹiɪt ɹɪˈspɑns tə kɹaɪm./
明确定义的问题可以更容易地选择适当的犯罪应对措施。
problem — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A practical solution to crime should fit local needs and remain realistic over time.
/ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈluʃən tə kɹaɪm ʃʊd fɪt ˈloʊkəl nidz ænd ɹɪˈmeɪn ˌɹiəˈlɪstɪk ˈoʊvɚ taɪm./
切实可行的犯罪解决方案应符合当地需求，并随着时间的推移保持现实。
practical solution — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A positive change in crime becomes credible when people can explain how it happened.
/ə ˈpɑzɪtɪv t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪn kɹaɪm bɪˈkʌmz ˈkɹɛdɪbəl wɛn ˈpipəl kən ɪkˈspleɪn haʊ ɪt ˈhæpənd./
当人们能够解释犯罪是如何发生的时，犯罪的积极变化就会变得可信。
positive change — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Practical support can help people respond to crime without removing individual responsibility.
/ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈpɔɹt kən hɛlp ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə kɹaɪm wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈmuvɪŋ ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɹiˌspɑnsɪˈbɪləti./
实际支持可以帮助人们应对犯罪，而无需免除个人责任。
support — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Communities can develop a practical response to crime by testing a small change first.
/kəˈmjunɪtiz kən dɪˈvɛləp ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə kɹaɪm baɪ ˈtɛstɪŋ ə smɔl t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ fɚst./
社区可以通过首先测试一个小的改变来制定针对犯罪的实际应对措施。
change — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The effect of crime may vary according to a person's needs, resources, and circumstances.
/ðə ɪˈfɛkt əv kɹaɪm meɪ ˈvɛɹi əˈkɔɹdɪŋ tə ə ˈpɚsənz nidz, ˈɹisɔɹsɪz, ænd ˈsɚkəmˌstænsɪz./
犯罪的影响可能因人的需要、资源和情况而异。
effect — 保留结构，替换真实细节。An opinion about crime becomes useful only after it is supported by a reason and an example.
/ən əˈpɪnjən əˈbaʊt kɹaɪm bɪˈkʌmz ˈjusfəl ˈoʊnli ˈæftɚ ɪt ɪz səˈpɔɹtɪd baɪ ə ˈɹizən ænd ən ɪɡˈzæmpəl./
关于犯罪的观点只有在得到理由和例子的支持后才变得有用。
opinion — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Debates about crime become difficult when people treat a partial truth as a complete explanation.
/dɪˈbeɪts əˈbaʊt kɹaɪm bɪˈkʌm ˈdɪfɪkʌlt wɛn ˈpipəl tɹit ə ˈpɑɹʃəl tɹuθ æz ə kəmˈplit ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən./
当人们将部分事实视为完整的解释时，有关犯罪的辩论就会变得困难。
Debates about crime become — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A stronger position acknowledges a reasonable objection, sets clear limits, and still explains why one conclusion is preferable.
/ə ˈstɹɔŋɡɚ pəˈzɪʃən ækˈnɑlɪd͡ʒɪz ə ˈɹiznəbəl əbˈd͡ʒɛkʃən, sɛts klɪɹ ˈlɪmɪts, ænd stɪl ɪkˈspleɪnz waɪ wʌn kəŋˈkluʒən ɪz ˈpɹɛfɚəbəl./
更强硬的立场承认合理的反对意见，设定明确的限制，并仍然解释为什么一个结论更可取。
A stronger position acknowledges — 保留结构，替换真实细节。This balance does not weaken the argument; it makes the judgement more precise, credible, and useful.
/ðɪs ˈbæləns dʌz nɑt ˈwikən ðə ˈɑɹɡjəmənt; ɪt meɪks ðə ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt mɔɹ pɹɪˈsaɪs, ˈkɹɛdɪbəl, ænd ˈjusfəl./
这种平衡并不削弱这一论点；它使判断更加准确、可信和有用。
This balance does not — 保留结构，替换真实细节。However, an early success can hide a cost that appears later.
/ˌhaʊˈɛvɚ, ən ˈɚli səkˈsɛs kən haɪd ə kɔst ðæt əˈpɪɹz ˈleɪtɚ./
然而，早期的成功可能会掩盖后来出现的成本。
however — 保留结构，替换真实细节。This matters because the decision changes what people can do in ordinary life.
/ðɪs ˈmætɚz bɪˈkʌz ðə dɪˈsɪʒən ˈt͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒɪz wʌt ˈpipəl kən du ɪn ˈɔɹdɪˌnɛɹi laɪf./
这很重要，因为决定会改变人们在普通生活中所能做的事情。
because — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Although one response may help, no single solution will suit every person.
/ɔlˈðoʊ wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns meɪ hɛlp, noʊ ˈsɪŋɡəl səˈluʃən wɪl sut ˈɛvɹi ˈpɚsən./
尽管一种回应可能会有所帮助，但没有一种解决方案适合所有人。
solution — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A balanced discussion of crime should include an example, a limitation, and a conclusion.
/ə ˈbælənst dɪˈskʌʃən əv kɹaɪm ʃʊd ɪŋˈklud ən ɪɡˈzæmpəl, ə ˌlɪmɪˈteɪʃən, ænd ə kəŋˈkluʒən./
对犯罪的平衡讨论应包括示例、限制和结论。
include an example — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The case shows why an important effect matters when people make decisions about crime.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ən ɪmˈpɔɹtənt ɪˈfɛkt ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt kɹaɪm./
案件表明，当人们就犯罪作出决定时，重要影响何在。
effect — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A possible solution can change how people understand and respond to crime.
/ə ˈpɑsəbəl səˈluʃən kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə kɹaɪm./
一个可能的解决方案可以改变人们理解和应对犯罪的方式。
solution — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A concrete example can provide evidence for a claim about crime.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən pɹəˈvaɪd ˈɛvədəns fɚ ə kleɪm əˈbaʊt kɹaɪm./
一个具体的例子可以为有关犯罪的主张提供证据。
provide evidence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A balanced approach to crime compares benefits, costs, and the needs of different groups.
/ə ˈbælənst əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ tə kɹaɪm kəmˈpɛɹz ˈbɛnəfɪts, kɔsts, ænd ðə nidz əv ˈdɪfɹənt ɡɹups./
平衡的犯罪方法会比较收益、成本和不同群体的需求。
a balanced approach — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main benefit of a thoughtful response to crime is a result that people can actually observe.
/ðə meɪn ˈbɛnəfɪt əv ə ˈθɔtfəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə kɹaɪm ɪz ə ɹɪˈzʌlt ðæt ˈpipəl kən ˈækt͡ʃəli əbˈzɚv./
对犯罪作出深思熟虑的反应的主要好处是人们可以实际观察到的结果。
benefit — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The main challenge is to respond to crime without creating a larger problem elsewhere.
/ðə meɪn ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒ ɪz tə ɹɪˈspɑnd tə kɹaɪm wɪˈðaʊt kɹiˈeɪtɪŋ ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˈpɹɑbləm ˈɛlˌswɛɹ./
主要挑战是在别处不造成更大的问题的情况下应对犯罪。
problem — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Strong evidence helps people judge crime without relying on a single attractive story.
/stɹɔŋ ˈɛvədəns hɛlps ˈpipəl d͡ʒʌd͡ʒ kɹaɪm wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈlaɪɪŋ ɔn ə ˈsɪŋɡəl əˈtɹæktɪv ˈstɔɹi./
强有力的证据帮助人们在不依赖单一的有吸引力的故事的情况下判断犯罪。
strong evidence — 保留结构，替换真实细节。The most practical lesson is that crime should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt kɹaɪm ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
最实际的教训是，应通过实际效果而不是有吸引力的口号来判断犯罪。
rather than — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Short-term measurements reveal immediate movement, while repeated observations show whether the change is likely to last.
/ʃɔɹt tɚm ˈmɛʒɚmənts ɹɪˈvil ɪˈmidiɪt ˈmuvmənt, waɪl ɹɪˈpitɪd ˌɑbzɚˈveɪʃənz ʃoʊ ˈwɛðɚ ðə t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪz ˈlaɪkli tə læst./
短期测量揭示了即时的变化，而重复观察则表明变化是否可能持续。
change — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Clear language matters here because an undefined claim can make two speakers appear to disagree when they mean different things.
/klɪɹ ˈlæŋɡwɪd͡ʒ ˈmætɚz hɪɹ bɪˈkʌz ən ˌʌndɪˈfaɪnd kleɪm kən meɪk tu ˈspikɚz əˈpɪɹ tə dɪsəˈɡɹi wɛn ðeɪ min ˈdɪfɹənt θɪŋz./
清晰的语言在这里很重要，因为未定义的主张可能会使两个说话者在表达不同意思时显得不同意。
because — 保留结构，替换真实细节。Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
好的决定会把明确目标、事实证据、人的真实经验，以及修正薄弱方案的意愿联系起来。
approach — 保留结构，替换真实细节。When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
当这些部分保持连贯时，无论日常交流还是 IELTS 回答，这个主题都会更容易展开。
When those parts stay — 保留结构，替换真实细节。A youth programme combined mentoring, training, and family support in an area with repeated offending.
/ə juθ ˈpɹoʊˌɡɹæm kəmˈbaɪnd ˈmɛntɔɹɪŋ, ˈtɹeɪnɪŋ, ænd ˈfæmɪli səˈpɔɹt ɪn ən ˈɛɹiə wɪθ ɹɪˈpitɪd əˈfɛndɪŋ./
At first, this looked like a small decision about crime, but its result soon became visible.
/æt fɚst, ðɪs lʊkt laɪk ə smɔl dɪˈsɪʒən əˈbaʊt kɹaɪm, bʌt ɪts ɹɪˈzʌlt sun bɪˈkeɪm ˈvɪzɪbəl./
The case raises a broader question: how prevention, enforcement, and rehabilitation affect safety.
/ðə keɪs ˈɹeɪzɪz ə ˈbɹɔdɚ ˈkwɛst͡ʃən: haʊ pɹiˈvɛnʃən, ɪnˈfɔɹsmənt, ænd ˌɹihəˌbɪlɪˈteɪʃən əˈfɛkt ˈseɪfti./
The response combines a short claim, a developed explanation, and a carefully limited conclusion.
/ðə ɹɪˈspɑns kəmˈbaɪnz ə ʃɔɹt kleɪm, ə dɪˈvɛləpt ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən, ænd ə ˈkɛɹfəli ˈlɪmɪtɪd kəŋˈkluʒən./
The example draws attention to a criminal offence, which can shape how people respond to crime.
/ðə ɪɡˈzæmpəl dɹɔz əˈtɛnʃən tə ə ˈkɹɪmənəl əˈfɛns, wɪt͡ʃ kən ʃeɪp haʊ ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə kɹaɪm./
A closer look at a prisoner rehabilitation reveals a practical side of crime that general opinions often miss.
/ə ˈkloʊsɚ lʊk æt ə ˈpɹɪznɚ ˌɹihəˌbɪlɪˈteɪʃən ɹɪˈvilz ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl saɪd əv kɹaɪm ðæt ˈd͡ʒɛnɚəl əˈpɪnjənz ˈɔftən mɪs./
The main advantage of one response to crime should be clear enough to observe or measure.
/ðə meɪn ædˈvæntɪd͡ʒ əv wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns tə kɹaɪm ʃʊd bi klɪɹ ɪˈnʌf tə əbˈzɚv ɔɹ ˈmɛʒɚ./
A clearly defined problem makes it easier to choose an appropriate response to crime.
/ə ˈklɪɹli dɪˈfaɪnd ˈpɹɑbləm meɪks ɪt ˈiziɚ tə t͡ʃuz ən əˈpɹoʊpɹiɪt ɹɪˈspɑns tə kɹaɪm./
A practical solution to crime should fit local needs and remain realistic over time.
/ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈluʃən tə kɹaɪm ʃʊd fɪt ˈloʊkəl nidz ænd ɹɪˈmeɪn ˌɹiəˈlɪstɪk ˈoʊvɚ taɪm./
A positive change in crime becomes credible when people can explain how it happened.
/ə ˈpɑzɪtɪv t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪn kɹaɪm bɪˈkʌmz ˈkɹɛdɪbəl wɛn ˈpipəl kən ɪkˈspleɪn haʊ ɪt ˈhæpənd./
Practical support can help people respond to crime without removing individual responsibility.
/ˈpɹæktɪkəl səˈpɔɹt kən hɛlp ˈpipəl ɹɪˈspɑnd tə kɹaɪm wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈmuvɪŋ ˌɪndɪˈvɪd͡ʒuəl ɹiˌspɑnsɪˈbɪləti./
Communities can develop a practical response to crime by testing a small change first.
/kəˈmjunɪtiz kən dɪˈvɛləp ə ˈpɹæktɪkəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə kɹaɪm baɪ ˈtɛstɪŋ ə smɔl t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ fɚst./
The effect of crime may vary according to a person's needs, resources, and circumstances.
/ðə ɪˈfɛkt əv kɹaɪm meɪ ˈvɛɹi əˈkɔɹdɪŋ tə ə ˈpɚsənz nidz, ˈɹisɔɹsɪz, ænd ˈsɚkəmˌstænsɪz./
An opinion about crime becomes useful only after it is supported by a reason and an example.
/ən əˈpɪnjən əˈbaʊt kɹaɪm bɪˈkʌmz ˈjusfəl ˈoʊnli ˈæftɚ ɪt ɪz səˈpɔɹtɪd baɪ ə ˈɹizən ænd ən ɪɡˈzæmpəl./
Debates about crime become difficult when people treat a partial truth as a complete explanation.
/dɪˈbeɪts əˈbaʊt kɹaɪm bɪˈkʌm ˈdɪfɪkʌlt wɛn ˈpipəl tɹit ə ˈpɑɹʃəl tɹuθ æz ə kəmˈplit ˌɛkspləˈneɪʃən./
A stronger position acknowledges a reasonable objection, sets clear limits, and still explains why one conclusion is preferable.
/ə ˈstɹɔŋɡɚ pəˈzɪʃən ækˈnɑlɪd͡ʒɪz ə ˈɹiznəbəl əbˈd͡ʒɛkʃən, sɛts klɪɹ ˈlɪmɪts, ænd stɪl ɪkˈspleɪnz waɪ wʌn kəŋˈkluʒən ɪz ˈpɹɛfɚəbəl./
This balance does not weaken the argument; it makes the judgement more precise, credible, and useful.
/ðɪs ˈbæləns dʌz nɑt ˈwikən ðə ˈɑɹɡjəmənt; ɪt meɪks ðə ˈd͡ʒʌd͡ʒmənt mɔɹ pɹɪˈsaɪs, ˈkɹɛdɪbəl, ænd ˈjusfəl./
However, an early success can hide a cost that appears later.
/ˌhaʊˈɛvɚ, ən ˈɚli səkˈsɛs kən haɪd ə kɔst ðæt əˈpɪɹz ˈleɪtɚ./
This matters because the decision changes what people can do in ordinary life.
/ðɪs ˈmætɚz bɪˈkʌz ðə dɪˈsɪʒən ˈt͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒɪz wʌt ˈpipəl kən du ɪn ˈɔɹdɪˌnɛɹi laɪf./
Although one response may help, no single solution will suit every person.
/ɔlˈðoʊ wʌn ɹɪˈspɑns meɪ hɛlp, noʊ ˈsɪŋɡəl səˈluʃən wɪl sut ˈɛvɹi ˈpɚsən./
A balanced discussion of crime should include an example, a limitation, and a conclusion.
/ə ˈbælənst dɪˈskʌʃən əv kɹaɪm ʃʊd ɪŋˈklud ən ɪɡˈzæmpəl, ə ˌlɪmɪˈteɪʃən, ænd ə kəŋˈkluʒən./
The case shows why an important effect matters when people make decisions about crime.
/ðə keɪs ʃoʊz waɪ ən ɪmˈpɔɹtənt ɪˈfɛkt ˈmætɚz wɛn ˈpipəl meɪk dɪˈsɪʒənz əˈbaʊt kɹaɪm./
A possible solution can change how people understand and respond to crime.
/ə ˈpɑsəbəl səˈluʃən kən t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ haʊ ˈpipəl ˌʌndɚˈstænd ænd ɹɪˈspɑnd tə kɹaɪm./
A concrete example can provide evidence for a claim about crime.
/ə ˈkɑŋkɹit ɪɡˈzæmpəl kən pɹəˈvaɪd ˈɛvədəns fɚ ə kleɪm əˈbaʊt kɹaɪm./
A balanced approach to crime compares benefits, costs, and the needs of different groups.
/ə ˈbælənst əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ tə kɹaɪm kəmˈpɛɹz ˈbɛnəfɪts, kɔsts, ænd ðə nidz əv ˈdɪfɹənt ɡɹups./
The main benefit of a thoughtful response to crime is a result that people can actually observe.
/ðə meɪn ˈbɛnəfɪt əv ə ˈθɔtfəl ɹɪˈspɑns tə kɹaɪm ɪz ə ɹɪˈzʌlt ðæt ˈpipəl kən ˈækt͡ʃəli əbˈzɚv./
The main challenge is to respond to crime without creating a larger problem elsewhere.
/ðə meɪn ˈt͡ʃælɪnd͡ʒ ɪz tə ɹɪˈspɑnd tə kɹaɪm wɪˈðaʊt kɹiˈeɪtɪŋ ə ˈlɑɹd͡ʒɚ ˈpɹɑbləm ˈɛlˌswɛɹ./
Strong evidence helps people judge crime without relying on a single attractive story.
/stɹɔŋ ˈɛvədəns hɛlps ˈpipəl d͡ʒʌd͡ʒ kɹaɪm wɪˈðaʊt ɹiˈlaɪɪŋ ɔn ə ˈsɪŋɡəl əˈtɹæktɪv ˈstɔɹi./
The most practical lesson is that crime should be judged through real effects rather than attractive slogans.
/ðə moʊst ˈpɹæktɪkəl ˈlɛsən ɪz ðæt kɹaɪm ʃʊd bi d͡ʒʌd͡ʒd θɹu ɹil ɪˈfɛkts ˈɹæðɚ ðən əˈtɹæktɪv ˈsloʊɡənz./
Short-term measurements reveal immediate movement, while repeated observations show whether the change is likely to last.
/ʃɔɹt tɚm ˈmɛʒɚmənts ɹɪˈvil ɪˈmidiɪt ˈmuvmənt, waɪl ɹɪˈpitɪd ˌɑbzɚˈveɪʃənz ʃoʊ ˈwɛðɚ ðə t͡ʃeɪnd͡ʒ ɪz ˈlaɪkli tə læst./
Clear language matters here because an undefined claim can make two speakers appear to disagree when they mean different things.
/klɪɹ ˈlæŋɡwɪd͡ʒ ˈmætɚz hɪɹ bɪˈkʌz ən ˌʌndɪˈfaɪnd kleɪm kən meɪk tu ˈspikɚz əˈpɪɹ tə dɪsəˈɡɹi wɛn ðeɪ min ˈdɪfɹənt θɪŋz./
Good decisions connect a clear purpose with evidence, human experience, and the willingness to revise a weak approach.
/ɡʊd dɪˈsɪʒənz kəˈnɛkt ə klɪɹ ˈpɚpəs wɪθ ˈɛvədəns, ˈhjumən ɪkˈspɪɹiəns, ænd ðə ˈwɪlɪŋnəs tə ɹɪˈvaɪz ə wik əˈpɹoʊt͡ʃ./
When those parts stay connected, the topic becomes easier to discuss in daily conversation and in an IELTS answer.
/wɛn ðoʊz pɑɹts steɪ kəˈnɛktɪd, ðə ˈtɑpɪk bɪˈkʌmz ˈiziɚ tə dɪˈskʌs ɪn ˈdeɪli ˌkɑnvɚˈseɪʃən ænd ɪn ən aɪ ɛl ti ɛs ˈænsɚ./
02 · Vocabulary
n./phrase · 违法行为
a key idea used when discussing crime
criminal offence
n./phrase · 改造
a key idea used when discussing crime
prisoner rehabilitation
n. · 优点
a condition that gives a benefit
main advantage
n. · 问题
a situation that needs a solution
solve a problem
n. · 解决办法
a way of solving a problem
practical solution
n./v. · 改变
to become different
positive change
n./v. · 支持
help that makes something possible
support an idea
v. · 发展
to grow or become more advanced
develop a skill
n. · 影响；结果
a change caused by something
have an effect on
n. · 观点
what a person thinks about something
express an opinion
adv. · 然而
used to introduce a contrasting idea
however, some people
conj. · 因为
for the reason that
because of
conj. · 尽管
despite the fact that
although it is
v. · 包括
to contain something as a part
include an example
adj. · 重要的
having great value or influence
play an important role
adj. · 可能的
able to happen or be done
as soon as possible
v. · 提供
to give something that is needed
provide evidence
n./v. · 方法；处理
a way of dealing with something
a balanced approach
n./v. · 益处
a helpful or positive effect
bring benefits
n./v. · 挑战
a difficult task that tests ability
face a challenge
n. · 证据
facts that support a claim
strong evidence
03 · Chunks
criminal offence违法行为；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。prisoner rehabilitation改造；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。main advantage优点；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。solve a problem问题；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。practical solution解决办法；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。positive change改变；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。support an idea支持；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。develop a skill发展；保留结构，替换一个真实细节。04 · Grammar
这个结构负责把事实、原因、条件或立场组织成一个边界清楚的复杂句。
结构：main clause + logical relationship + supporting clause
原文证据：The response combines a short claim, a developed explanation, and a carefully limited conclusion.
常见错误：先保证两个分句都完整，再追求句式复杂度；不要用连接词拼接残句。
你的替换：保留结构，把主题换成自己的工作、生活或学习经历。
05 · Pronunciation
练法：慢读单词 → 读完整搭配 → 回到原句；每一步只录一遍，听完再修正。
06 · Spiral review
Day 350、Day 348、Day 344、Day 337、Day 321
07 · Speak with AI
你是我的一对一英语口语教练。今天是 Day 351，主题是 crime，程度目标是 B2→C1。
先让我用自己的话复述今天的文章；一次只问一个问题，并等待我回答。
如果我卡住，只给 2–4 个关键词或一个句首，不要直接给完整答案。
请引导我使用这些词：offence, rehabilitation, advantage, problem, solution, change, support, develop, effect, opinion, however。
我的回答至少包含：一个事实、一个原因、一个具体例子、一个结果或判断。
每轮结束后只纠正最影响理解的 1 个语法问题和 1 个发音问题，然后让我重新回答同一个问题。
最后让我脱稿回答：How is crime connected to your real life, and what have you learned from it?
结束时用中文列出：做得好的证据、需要修正的两点、三个可复用句型、明天应复习的内容。08 · Imitation
必须回收
offence, rehabilitation, advantage, problem, solution, change, support, develop, effect, opinion, however09 · Three-hour path